It would seem that the hearing process should provide the means of establishing the factual basis for decision through the application of the test provided by law. If, as widely believed in the industry, decisions after hearings are not fair to competing parties, and if, for that reason, the results are not consistent with the public interest, there is obviously cause to examine the procedures employed in the hearing process. This Article undertakes both to examine the hearing process of the Commission relating to contests between competing broadcast applicants as it has evolved and to suggest changes in approach as shown to be necessary
It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the broadcast license practice and procedure before the F...
"Serial no. 93-93."Hearings held June 18-27 (part 1) and July 23-31 (part 2), 1974, on S. 16, 247, 2...
The broadcast media has an obligation to permit a legally qualified candidate for federal office to ...
It would seem that the hearing process should provide the means of establishing the factual basis fo...
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) employs a comparative renewal process in determining w...
When the owners of a Jackson, Mississippi television station applied to the Federal Communications C...
Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as amended, directs the Federal Communications...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
T Section 404.6 permits the arrest and prosecution of every person who, by acts or conduct, intends ...
The FCC's 1965 policy statement concerning decisions in comparative broadcast licensing cases was a ...
Section 312(a)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934 requires that broadcast stations provide legally...
The recent Federal Communications Commission deregulation of many aspects of radio station programmi...
The Communications Act explicitly makes the applicant\u27s character an element in licensing. Applic...
The debate over the first amendment justification for broadcast regulation has become heatedly polar...
This Article focuses on the Supreme Court\u27s decision in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 129...
It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the broadcast license practice and procedure before the F...
"Serial no. 93-93."Hearings held June 18-27 (part 1) and July 23-31 (part 2), 1974, on S. 16, 247, 2...
The broadcast media has an obligation to permit a legally qualified candidate for federal office to ...
It would seem that the hearing process should provide the means of establishing the factual basis fo...
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) employs a comparative renewal process in determining w...
When the owners of a Jackson, Mississippi television station applied to the Federal Communications C...
Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as amended, directs the Federal Communications...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
T Section 404.6 permits the arrest and prosecution of every person who, by acts or conduct, intends ...
The FCC's 1965 policy statement concerning decisions in comparative broadcast licensing cases was a ...
Section 312(a)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934 requires that broadcast stations provide legally...
The recent Federal Communications Commission deregulation of many aspects of radio station programmi...
The Communications Act explicitly makes the applicant\u27s character an element in licensing. Applic...
The debate over the first amendment justification for broadcast regulation has become heatedly polar...
This Article focuses on the Supreme Court\u27s decision in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 129...
It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the broadcast license practice and procedure before the F...
"Serial no. 93-93."Hearings held June 18-27 (part 1) and July 23-31 (part 2), 1974, on S. 16, 247, 2...
The broadcast media has an obligation to permit a legally qualified candidate for federal office to ...