Add to ORKGIn this article, Professor Steenson continues the discussion that began in The Anatomy of Products Liability in Minnesota: The Theories of Recovery, appearing in the last Issue of the William Mitchell Law Review, by shifting the analytical focus to the problems involved in allocating awards among the parties in Minnesota products liability cases. Professor Steenson analyzes defenses, contribution and indemnity, and the impact of Minnesota\u27s comparative fault act on products liability law
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
This article seeks to serve the needs of the Montana bench and bar by addressing the issues likely t...
In Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories the Supreme Court of California created the market share liability...
In this article, Professor Steenson continues the discussion that began in The Anatomy of Products L...
The law of products Iiability has undergone a dramatic evolution since MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co....
This Article compares the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability with Minnesota products l...
The Minnesota law of products liability underwent significant changes in the 1980s. The courts fille...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...
The idea for this William Mitchell Law Review Symposium on products liability law belongs to Ken Ros...
The evolution and application of products liability law continues to be one of the most dynamic deve...
The purpose of this article is to provide a foundation for judges and lawyers, primarily in Minnesot...
This chapter provides a survey of much of the recent theoretical economic analysis of products liabi...
In the United States, a successful litigant is generally not entitled to recover attorneys\u27 fees ...
article published in law journalThe frequency and severity of products liability lawsuits have becom...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
This article seeks to serve the needs of the Montana bench and bar by addressing the issues likely t...
In Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories the Supreme Court of California created the market share liability...
In this article, Professor Steenson continues the discussion that began in The Anatomy of Products L...
The law of products Iiability has undergone a dramatic evolution since MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co....
This Article compares the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability with Minnesota products l...
The Minnesota law of products liability underwent significant changes in the 1980s. The courts fille...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...
The idea for this William Mitchell Law Review Symposium on products liability law belongs to Ken Ros...
The evolution and application of products liability law continues to be one of the most dynamic deve...
The purpose of this article is to provide a foundation for judges and lawyers, primarily in Minnesot...
This chapter provides a survey of much of the recent theoretical economic analysis of products liabi...
In the United States, a successful litigant is generally not entitled to recover attorneys\u27 fees ...
article published in law journalThe frequency and severity of products liability lawsuits have becom...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
This article seeks to serve the needs of the Montana bench and bar by addressing the issues likely t...
In Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories the Supreme Court of California created the market share liability...