Perspectives on Disclosing Rape Victims\u27 Names

In this Essay, Professor Denno examines the century-long conflict between an individual\u27s right to privacy and the freedom of the press in the context of the media\u27s disclosure of rape victims\u27 names. Part I briefly reviews the United States Supreme Court\u27s primary rulings on this topic, explaining that the Court has generally protected the freedom of the press under the First Amendment Part I emphasizes, however, that the Court has left available an opportunity for a con- trary interpretation under certain circumstances in Florida Star v. BJ.F., the Court\u27s last ruling concerning the disclosure of rape victims\u27 names. Part I1 discusses some of the major arguments for and against disclosing rape victims\u27 names. For example, while proponents of disclosure insist that withholding the victims\u27 names increases the stigma attached to rape, opponents claim that this very stigma justifies why rape and its victims should be treated differently. This Essay concludes by raising pertinent questions, unanswered by past cases, that may provide additional considerations for the future. Lastly, the Essay introduces commentary on this topic by Michael Gartner, Linda Fairstein, and Helen Benedict