In the essay, Professor Bedi discusses a prominent issue in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence: whether an individual\u27s cell phone location data is constitutionally protected. The emergence of this data and law enforcement\u27s attempts to utilize it have raised new questions about the reach of the third-party and public disclosure doctrines, which have traditionally rendered the Fourth Amendment inapplicable to seemingly similar data in certain circumstances. Bedi explores these new questions, providing a helpful overview of the different manifestations of this data and a critical survey of lower courts\u27 varying approaches to law enforcement\u27s attempts at securing it. Ultimately, Bedi argues for a new way of understanding the third-pa...
In modern society, the cell phone has become a virtual extension of most Americans, managing all kin...
The rights secured to us by the Fourth Amendment were the driving force behind the American Revoluti...
This Note argues that the “specific and articulable facts” standard does not accord with the intent ...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a warrant was required to obtain histori...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
The warrantless acquisition of cell site location information (CSLI) by law enforcement implicates s...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
Cell phones are a way of life in our society. While most people readily use their cell phones, they ...
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, ...
The near ubiquity of smart phones in American society raises a multitude of issues as courts attempt...
The authors examine the unique legal and privacy implications that cell site location information tr...
In 2012, federal juries convicted two men of armed robbery based in part on historical cell site loc...
In modern society, the cell phone has become a virtual extension of most Americans, managing all kin...
The rights secured to us by the Fourth Amendment were the driving force behind the American Revoluti...
This Note argues that the “specific and articulable facts” standard does not accord with the intent ...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a warrant was required to obtain histori...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
The warrantless acquisition of cell site location information (CSLI) by law enforcement implicates s...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
Cell phones are a way of life in our society. While most people readily use their cell phones, they ...
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, ...
The near ubiquity of smart phones in American society raises a multitude of issues as courts attempt...
The authors examine the unique legal and privacy implications that cell site location information tr...
In 2012, federal juries convicted two men of armed robbery based in part on historical cell site loc...
In modern society, the cell phone has become a virtual extension of most Americans, managing all kin...
The rights secured to us by the Fourth Amendment were the driving force behind the American Revoluti...
This Note argues that the “specific and articulable facts” standard does not accord with the intent ...