Add to ORKG(Excerpt) Part I discusses the development of the Court\u27s \u27 kids are different decisions. Part II argues that the rationale behind Graham applies not only to life-without-parole sentences but also to lengthy term-of-years sentences for juvenile non-homicide offenders. Part III suggests a constitutional mandate as to when states must provide a meaningful opportunity for release and explores other legislative action states can employ to comply with Graham
Almost 12,000 people in the United States are serving life sentences for crimes that occurred when t...
Last term, in Graham v Florida,1 the United States Supreme Court found unconstitutional the sentence...
Ledale Nathan was convicted of second-degree murder and a series of nonhomicide offenses stemming fr...
(Excerpt) Part I discusses the development of the Court\u27s \u27 kids are different decisions. Par...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that the spirit of the trilogy prohibits courts from sentencing juvenile ...
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to sentence a non-homi...
Is a life sentence without the possibility of parole for a nonhomicidal crime a constitutional viola...
A juvenile offender waits for sentencing while a court calculates his life expectancy and determines...
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution—specifically, the Cruel and...
The United States Supreme Court has recently recognized new constitutional limitations on the use of...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
Terrance Graham pled guilty to armed burglary with assault or battery and attempted armed robbery wh...
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to sentence a non-homi...
The Supreme Court has held that life without parole is an unconstitutional sentence for nearly all j...
Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s current juvenile sentencing jurisprudence, a juvenile may legally rec...
Almost 12,000 people in the United States are serving life sentences for crimes that occurred when t...
Last term, in Graham v Florida,1 the United States Supreme Court found unconstitutional the sentence...
Ledale Nathan was convicted of second-degree murder and a series of nonhomicide offenses stemming fr...
(Excerpt) Part I discusses the development of the Court\u27s \u27 kids are different decisions. Par...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that the spirit of the trilogy prohibits courts from sentencing juvenile ...
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to sentence a non-homi...
Is a life sentence without the possibility of parole for a nonhomicidal crime a constitutional viola...
A juvenile offender waits for sentencing while a court calculates his life expectancy and determines...
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution—specifically, the Cruel and...
The United States Supreme Court has recently recognized new constitutional limitations on the use of...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
Terrance Graham pled guilty to armed burglary with assault or battery and attempted armed robbery wh...
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to sentence a non-homi...
The Supreme Court has held that life without parole is an unconstitutional sentence for nearly all j...
Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s current juvenile sentencing jurisprudence, a juvenile may legally rec...
Almost 12,000 people in the United States are serving life sentences for crimes that occurred when t...
Last term, in Graham v Florida,1 the United States Supreme Court found unconstitutional the sentence...
Ledale Nathan was convicted of second-degree murder and a series of nonhomicide offenses stemming fr...