The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public domain -- tends to focus on how good or bad it is as an adjudicative institution. But its justification has always been as a political institution. Though the civil jury’s role as a political institution has strong historical roots, its place in our contemporary political system has received relatively little, sustained scholarly attention. This Symposium aims to build on recent work taking a renewed look at the various justifications for the civil jury as a political institution: as an instrument of popular sovereignty, a vehicle for applying community norms in law, a source of democratic legitimacy, and a check on government and corporate powe...
In federal civil litigation, decisionmaking power is shared by juries, trial courts, and appellate c...
Civil jury service should be a potent form of deliberative democracy, creating greater civic engagem...
Citizens directly participate in the civil justice system in three ways. They can be sued, they can ...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
At the root of many contemporary debates over the civil justice or tort system—debates over punitive...
This paper attempts to examine critically the role of the civil jury by determining what functions i...
Almost from the moment the law is set to paper, it is shaped and refined through acts of interpretat...
The United States is in a period of democratic decline. Waning commitment to principles of self-gove...
In his article, Professor Landsman surveys the historical progress of the civil jury. He argues that...
Historically, the American legal system has accorded juries wide discretion to impose sentences in t...
Despite the early American jury’s near-mythical role as a check on overreaching government agents, t...
In federal civil litigation, decisionmaking power is shared by juries, trial courts, and appellate c...
Civil jury service should be a potent form of deliberative democracy, creating greater civic engagem...
Citizens directly participate in the civil justice system in three ways. They can be sued, they can ...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
The debate over the civil jury in the United States – in both the academic literature and public dom...
At the root of many contemporary debates over the civil justice or tort system—debates over punitive...
This paper attempts to examine critically the role of the civil jury by determining what functions i...
Almost from the moment the law is set to paper, it is shaped and refined through acts of interpretat...
The United States is in a period of democratic decline. Waning commitment to principles of self-gove...
In his article, Professor Landsman surveys the historical progress of the civil jury. He argues that...
Historically, the American legal system has accorded juries wide discretion to impose sentences in t...
Despite the early American jury’s near-mythical role as a check on overreaching government agents, t...
In federal civil litigation, decisionmaking power is shared by juries, trial courts, and appellate c...
Civil jury service should be a potent form of deliberative democracy, creating greater civic engagem...
Citizens directly participate in the civil justice system in three ways. They can be sued, they can ...