The purpose of this article is twofold: first, some of the gaps in Convention protections of non-combatants will be identified; and second, possible remedies will be offered. The alleged atrocities at My Lai have exposed one major gap in Convention protection, although surprisingly few popular or scholarly commentators have mentioned or discussed it. The Geneva Civilian Convention does not protect the nationals of a co-belligerent state from the depredations of an ally. The author details the Geneva Convention categories that apply in these situations and offers revisions that could be implemented to provide the laws necessary to protect non-combatants
The article dwells on the issues of formation and development of the international legal norms regul...
This article is part of a three-part series addressing the question whether the law of armed conflic...
The article analyses the meaning of protection in international refugee law and argues that this sho...
The purpose of this article is twofold: first, some of the gaps in Convention protections of non-com...
Protecting civilians in armed conflicts represents one of the main goals of international humanitari...
The regulation of armed non-state actors is a challenge to the state-centric international law para...
Non-uniformed combat morally infringes on civilians’ fundamental right to immunity and exacts an imp...
Persons that involved in an armed conflict are protected by law which regulated in Article 13 of Gen...
Avant les Conventions de Genève de 1949, seuls les conflits armés internationaux étaient réglementés...
This article considers whether, in the context of armed conflicts, certain non-refoulement obligatio...
Rapid development in international humanitarian law characterises the 20th century. Besides the peop...
From the beginning of the existence, countries have used wars as a method to achieve goals. That has...
Notion of direct participation in hostilities has been a complex and contentious phenomenon within t...
This article examines the evolution of international humanitarian law, specifically as it relates to...
This article investigates how – by breaking with the historical double standards regarding civilian ...
The article dwells on the issues of formation and development of the international legal norms regul...
This article is part of a three-part series addressing the question whether the law of armed conflic...
The article analyses the meaning of protection in international refugee law and argues that this sho...
The purpose of this article is twofold: first, some of the gaps in Convention protections of non-com...
Protecting civilians in armed conflicts represents one of the main goals of international humanitari...
The regulation of armed non-state actors is a challenge to the state-centric international law para...
Non-uniformed combat morally infringes on civilians’ fundamental right to immunity and exacts an imp...
Persons that involved in an armed conflict are protected by law which regulated in Article 13 of Gen...
Avant les Conventions de Genève de 1949, seuls les conflits armés internationaux étaient réglementés...
This article considers whether, in the context of armed conflicts, certain non-refoulement obligatio...
Rapid development in international humanitarian law characterises the 20th century. Besides the peop...
From the beginning of the existence, countries have used wars as a method to achieve goals. That has...
Notion of direct participation in hostilities has been a complex and contentious phenomenon within t...
This article examines the evolution of international humanitarian law, specifically as it relates to...
This article investigates how – by breaking with the historical double standards regarding civilian ...
The article dwells on the issues of formation and development of the international legal norms regul...
This article is part of a three-part series addressing the question whether the law of armed conflic...
The article analyses the meaning of protection in international refugee law and argues that this sho...