For more than a century, non-majority groups have protested the use of trademarks comprised of or containing terms referencing the group—albeit for various reasons. Under the 1946 Lanham Act, Congress added a prohibition against registering disparaging trademarks, which could offer protection to non-majority groups targeted by the use of trademarks offensive to members of the group. The prohibition remained relatively unclear, however, and rarely applied in that context until a group of Native Americans petitioned to cancel the Washington NFL team’s trademarks as either scandalous, offensive to the general population, or disparaging, offensive to the referenced group. In clarifying the appropriate test for disparaging, however, the decision...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
This article traces the history of the Cleveland Indians and Chief Wahoo. It then suggests and asses...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
For more than a century, non-majority groups have protested the use of trademarks comprised of or co...
Since 1967, Pro-Football has registered six marks that include the term “redskins,” a derogatory rac...
In June 2014, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) shocked football fans everywhere when it g...
The Lanham Act proscribes the registration of trademarks that consist of disparaging matter. In In r...
[Excerpt] Under federal law, trademarks that may disparage people, or bring them into contempt, are...
On August 5, 2005, the National Collegiate Athletic Association introduced its plan to end the use o...
There has been a long history of conflict and disputation in respect of Indigenous Intellectual Prop...
There is a contentious debate about whether it is the government\u27s place to determine whether off...
In Harjo v. Pro-Football Inc., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelled the federally register...
In the 2016-2017 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Matal v. Tam, holding that the Lanham...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
The trouble with the Federal law of trademarks is that it rests on unstated assumptions about how ma...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
This article traces the history of the Cleveland Indians and Chief Wahoo. It then suggests and asses...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
For more than a century, non-majority groups have protested the use of trademarks comprised of or co...
Since 1967, Pro-Football has registered six marks that include the term “redskins,” a derogatory rac...
In June 2014, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) shocked football fans everywhere when it g...
The Lanham Act proscribes the registration of trademarks that consist of disparaging matter. In In r...
[Excerpt] Under federal law, trademarks that may disparage people, or bring them into contempt, are...
On August 5, 2005, the National Collegiate Athletic Association introduced its plan to end the use o...
There has been a long history of conflict and disputation in respect of Indigenous Intellectual Prop...
There is a contentious debate about whether it is the government\u27s place to determine whether off...
In Harjo v. Pro-Football Inc., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelled the federally register...
In the 2016-2017 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Matal v. Tam, holding that the Lanham...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
The trouble with the Federal law of trademarks is that it rests on unstated assumptions about how ma...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
This article traces the history of the Cleveland Indians and Chief Wahoo. It then suggests and asses...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...