Add to ORKGAward for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to award both damages for permanent future injury and injunctive relief to correct the situation to prevent such future injury
Insureds were not entitled to damages for cost of replacing defective stucco where they sought cover...
Because the city and its officials owed to the homeowners no specific duty to maintain the waterways...
Appellants were properly held liable for damages sustained by the company when appellants\u27 conduc...
Award for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to awa...
Although there had been a breach of a real property exchange agreement because of the failure of one...
Discusses, with reference to the Australian High Court ruling in Grajewsi v DPP (NSW), whether rende...
Award of severance damages for landowner\u27s non-abutting parcel in condemnation case was vacated b...
Judgment for driver in suit for damages sustained in car accident was proper as husband was contribu...
Discusses the Chancery Division decision in John Smith & Co (Edinburgh) Ltd v Hill on the extent to ...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was not applicable where defendant relinquished all control of the...
Comments on the Chancery Division decision in Jackson v JH Watson Property Investment Ltd on whether...
Grant of a new trial in favor of a customer on issue of damages, in his action to recover for person...
Section 2 of the Chancery Amendment Act 1858 (Lord Cairns\u27 Act) conferred jurisdiction upon the C...
There is considerable confusion in text books and decisions in the use of the expression vested int...
Insureds were not entitled to damages for cost of replacing defective stucco where they sought cover...
Because the city and its officials owed to the homeowners no specific duty to maintain the waterways...
Appellants were properly held liable for damages sustained by the company when appellants\u27 conduc...
Award for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to awa...
Although there had been a breach of a real property exchange agreement because of the failure of one...
Discusses, with reference to the Australian High Court ruling in Grajewsi v DPP (NSW), whether rende...
Award of severance damages for landowner\u27s non-abutting parcel in condemnation case was vacated b...
Judgment for driver in suit for damages sustained in car accident was proper as husband was contribu...
Discusses the Chancery Division decision in John Smith & Co (Edinburgh) Ltd v Hill on the extent to ...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was not applicable where defendant relinquished all control of the...
Comments on the Chancery Division decision in Jackson v JH Watson Property Investment Ltd on whether...
Grant of a new trial in favor of a customer on issue of damages, in his action to recover for person...
Section 2 of the Chancery Amendment Act 1858 (Lord Cairns\u27 Act) conferred jurisdiction upon the C...
There is considerable confusion in text books and decisions in the use of the expression vested int...
Insureds were not entitled to damages for cost of replacing defective stucco where they sought cover...
Because the city and its officials owed to the homeowners no specific duty to maintain the waterways...
Appellants were properly held liable for damages sustained by the company when appellants\u27 conduc...