Add to ORKGPartial new trial on damages was improperly ordered as issue of liability was very close and record evidence suggested that award was the result of a compromise, and thus, it would have been unjust to have a new trial limited to issue of damages
The plaintiff brought suit against two defendants, claiming $56,000 for personal injuries suffered i...
In a personal injury action brought by a customer against a department store, the trial court commit...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
Partial new trial on damages was improperly ordered as issue of liability was very close and record ...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
Grant of a new trial in favor of a customer on issue of damages, in his action to recover for person...
Where a jury verdict was the result of compromise, there had been no acceptable determination of lia...
In a negligence action for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, one of three successful pla...
The trial court erred in giving certain instructions requested by defendant because the jury should ...
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suff...
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
In a case where the evidence was not clearly persuasive in favor of either party, and where there wa...
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
An alleged conflict between the information and the evidence was not grounds for reversal of defenda...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
The plaintiff brought suit against two defendants, claiming $56,000 for personal injuries suffered i...
In a personal injury action brought by a customer against a department store, the trial court commit...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
Partial new trial on damages was improperly ordered as issue of liability was very close and record ...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
Grant of a new trial in favor of a customer on issue of damages, in his action to recover for person...
Where a jury verdict was the result of compromise, there had been no acceptable determination of lia...
In a negligence action for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, one of three successful pla...
The trial court erred in giving certain instructions requested by defendant because the jury should ...
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suff...
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
In a case where the evidence was not clearly persuasive in favor of either party, and where there wa...
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
An alleged conflict between the information and the evidence was not grounds for reversal of defenda...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
The plaintiff brought suit against two defendants, claiming $56,000 for personal injuries suffered i...
In a personal injury action brought by a customer against a department store, the trial court commit...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...