The recent Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has dramatically expanded takings jurisprudence, granting municipalities the power to take from one private owner for the economic benefit of both private developers and communities at large. Although the expansion has great potential to create necessary benefits for various municipalities, the victims of the takings, private owners who are stripped of their property, are now cast in a brighter light. This article argues that there is no longer the same balance there once was with takings, namely property being taken for a purely public use in exchange for fair market value or just compensation. In this new era where private developers team up with municipalities to create ec...
Eminent domain has been a government power for centuries. In most cases, eminent domain is used to p...
This article argues that the Court\u27s holding creates an incentive for private developers to rent-...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...
The recent Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has dramatically expanded takings ju...
This Article proposes a paradigm shift in takings law, namely “inclusionary eminent domain.” This ne...
This Article challenges a foundational assumption about eminent domain - namely, that owners are sys...
Constitutional takings protections, such as those in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Consti...
If eminent domain is to serve true community development, statutory reforms must limit its propensit...
If eminent domain is to serve true community development, statutory reforms must limit its propensit...
This Article is the first academic paper to systematically consider the environmental impact of the ...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
This paper investigates changes of interpretations about the taking clause and public use based on t...
North Texas is the focus of this Comment because it is a microcosm of the interaction between compet...
This Article proposes a fair return model for the takings clause. This conception of the clause has ...
Owning property, starting a business, and owning your own home are things considered to be part of t...
Eminent domain has been a government power for centuries. In most cases, eminent domain is used to p...
This article argues that the Court\u27s holding creates an incentive for private developers to rent-...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...
The recent Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London has dramatically expanded takings ju...
This Article proposes a paradigm shift in takings law, namely “inclusionary eminent domain.” This ne...
This Article challenges a foundational assumption about eminent domain - namely, that owners are sys...
Constitutional takings protections, such as those in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Consti...
If eminent domain is to serve true community development, statutory reforms must limit its propensit...
If eminent domain is to serve true community development, statutory reforms must limit its propensit...
This Article is the first academic paper to systematically consider the environmental impact of the ...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
This paper investigates changes of interpretations about the taking clause and public use based on t...
North Texas is the focus of this Comment because it is a microcosm of the interaction between compet...
This Article proposes a fair return model for the takings clause. This conception of the clause has ...
Owning property, starting a business, and owning your own home are things considered to be part of t...
Eminent domain has been a government power for centuries. In most cases, eminent domain is used to p...
This article argues that the Court\u27s holding creates an incentive for private developers to rent-...
The Supreme Court\u27s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London brought the issues of takings and...