This note traces the history of the presumption of parenthood and applies the traditional rationales underlying the presumption to support its application to married lesbian couples. Part I discusses the formation of the presumption in England and recognizes that the presumption was created for three important reasons: to protect the child; to protect the public purse; and to protect the biological family. Part II discusses state laws on artificial insemination and dissects the basic requirements for both same-sex and opposite-sex parents. This Part then applies the presumption\u27s traditional rationales to lesbian couples having children, arguing that the same presumption should apply regardless of the orientation of the parents
In heterologous artificial insemination, the donation of gametes (either sperm or eggs) from a third...
This Note analyzes KM v. E.G., 13 Cal. Rptr 3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), the first case brought in f...
This Note analyzes KM v. E.G., 13 Cal. Rptr 3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), the first case brought in f...
This note traces the history of the presumption of parenthood and applies the traditional rationales...
The focus of this chapter is the significance of the legal ascription of parenthood, in the context ...
This book examines the legal framework and practices surrounding licensed donor insemination in Brit...
Should a child be allowed two legal parents only if born into a marriage? For children of heterosexu...
Should a child be allowed two legal parents only if born into a marriage? For children of heterosexu...
Abstract: The increasing use of artificial reproductive techniques generates very complex problems c...
This paper explores cases involving disputes between lesbian parents and known donors with whom info...
This paper explores cases involving disputes between lesbian parents and known donors with whom info...
This paper explores cases involving disputes between lesbian parents and known donors with whom info...
The marital presumption of paternity, which arose from English common law, has served as a core comp...
The marital presumption is deeply rooted in Anglo-American law: a husband and wife are assumed to be...
In Part I of this article, Dalton briefly reviews the way legal scholars commonly define sex-based d...
In heterologous artificial insemination, the donation of gametes (either sperm or eggs) from a third...
This Note analyzes KM v. E.G., 13 Cal. Rptr 3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), the first case brought in f...
This Note analyzes KM v. E.G., 13 Cal. Rptr 3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), the first case brought in f...
This note traces the history of the presumption of parenthood and applies the traditional rationales...
The focus of this chapter is the significance of the legal ascription of parenthood, in the context ...
This book examines the legal framework and practices surrounding licensed donor insemination in Brit...
Should a child be allowed two legal parents only if born into a marriage? For children of heterosexu...
Should a child be allowed two legal parents only if born into a marriage? For children of heterosexu...
Abstract: The increasing use of artificial reproductive techniques generates very complex problems c...
This paper explores cases involving disputes between lesbian parents and known donors with whom info...
This paper explores cases involving disputes between lesbian parents and known donors with whom info...
This paper explores cases involving disputes between lesbian parents and known donors with whom info...
The marital presumption of paternity, which arose from English common law, has served as a core comp...
The marital presumption is deeply rooted in Anglo-American law: a husband and wife are assumed to be...
In Part I of this article, Dalton briefly reviews the way legal scholars commonly define sex-based d...
In heterologous artificial insemination, the donation of gametes (either sperm or eggs) from a third...
This Note analyzes KM v. E.G., 13 Cal. Rptr 3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), the first case brought in f...
This Note analyzes KM v. E.G., 13 Cal. Rptr 3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), the first case brought in f...