Add to ORKGThis symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct in its narrowness; and correct in calling on courts to be more rigorous in recusal than due process requires. The article argues that Caperton is a model of judicial restraint and that, paradoxically for a decision overturning a state justice\u27s non-recusal, the majority\u27s approach is a model of cooperative federalism. These characteristics are particularly exemplified by the degree to which the opinion tracks the counsel offered by the Conference of Chief Justices, both as to what the opinion decides, and as to what it does not decide. Second, the article asserts that the breadth of support for the petitioners in Caperton, combined with ...
In June of 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that an elected judge must recuse h...
Before Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252, 2266 (2009). due process mandated judicial...
Apolitical, impartial judging has always been our judicial ideal. In the last twenty years, however,...
This symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct i...
It is virtually impossible to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal C...
This Article considers the significant state court reform developments in the year following the Sup...
In his thoughtful and provocative article, Professor Ronald Rotunda offers several arguments against...
The issue of judicial competence and integrity is particularly troubling in the wake of Caperton v. ...
Two reasons may support the result in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. First, though Caperton may i...
The American legal system requires a fair and impartial judiciary. This much is common ground. The m...
The article looks at a panel discussion on judicial responsibility and the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s d...
When Caperton v. Massey came before the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2009, the Court ruled that the du...
The merits of judicial elections have been litigated in journals around the country. In light of th...
The merits of judicial elections have been litigated in journals around the country. In light of th...
In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., decided in 2009, the Supreme Court held for the first time that...
In June of 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that an elected judge must recuse h...
Before Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252, 2266 (2009). due process mandated judicial...
Apolitical, impartial judging has always been our judicial ideal. In the last twenty years, however,...
This symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct i...
It is virtually impossible to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal C...
This Article considers the significant state court reform developments in the year following the Sup...
In his thoughtful and provocative article, Professor Ronald Rotunda offers several arguments against...
The issue of judicial competence and integrity is particularly troubling in the wake of Caperton v. ...
Two reasons may support the result in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. First, though Caperton may i...
The American legal system requires a fair and impartial judiciary. This much is common ground. The m...
The article looks at a panel discussion on judicial responsibility and the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s d...
When Caperton v. Massey came before the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2009, the Court ruled that the du...
The merits of judicial elections have been litigated in journals around the country. In light of th...
The merits of judicial elections have been litigated in journals around the country. In light of th...
In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., decided in 2009, the Supreme Court held for the first time that...
In June of 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that an elected judge must recuse h...
Before Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252, 2266 (2009). due process mandated judicial...
Apolitical, impartial judging has always been our judicial ideal. In the last twenty years, however,...