To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces published by the Law Review over the past 100 years and will republish one piece in each issue. The second piece selected by the Board is the testimony of Ignatius M. Wilkinson, the fourth and longest-serving dean of Fordham Law School (1923–1954), to the Judicial Committee of the U.S. Senate. Speaking to the Committee on the Judiciary, Wilkinson criticized the Franklin D. Roosevelt Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937 because it would “undermine the independence of the courts” and “shake[] the foundations of our constitutional structure.” Wilkinson’s testimony appeared in the May 1937 edition of the Fordham Law Review, only two years afte...
This study evolves around an attempt of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to induce the Congress to pa...
The literature on reform of the federal courts in 1937 understandably focuses on the history and con...
Correspondence from Victor H. Kramer commenting on Patrick Schlitz's review of Chief Justice Rehnqui...
To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces publis...
To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces publis...
ln his Constitutional History of the United States Andrew C. McLaughlin refers to the Senate\u27s co...
In the final weeks of its sixteen year history, the subject matter of the Warren Court\u27s opinions...
This booklet chronicles one aspect of our history: tbe relationship between Fordham Law School and t...
Fordham Law School has enjoyed a long and distinguished relationship with the Supreme Court of the U...
In recent years one often hears lawyers say that the Constitution is gone; or one hears them echo t...
To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces publis...
Book Chapter Richard W. Garnett, Good News Club v. Milford Central School ,in Oxford Companion to th...
When Earl Warren joined the Court as its fourteenth Chief Justice in 1953, Jim Crow ruled the South....
For more than two centuries, the U.S. Supreme Court has provided a battleground for nearly every con...
On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court decided in Brown v. Board of Education that state laws segregatin...
This study evolves around an attempt of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to induce the Congress to pa...
The literature on reform of the federal courts in 1937 understandably focuses on the history and con...
Correspondence from Victor H. Kramer commenting on Patrick Schlitz's review of Chief Justice Rehnqui...
To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces publis...
To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces publis...
ln his Constitutional History of the United States Andrew C. McLaughlin refers to the Senate\u27s co...
In the final weeks of its sixteen year history, the subject matter of the Warren Court\u27s opinions...
This booklet chronicles one aspect of our history: tbe relationship between Fordham Law School and t...
Fordham Law School has enjoyed a long and distinguished relationship with the Supreme Court of the U...
In recent years one often hears lawyers say that the Constitution is gone; or one hears them echo t...
To commemorate our founding in 1914, the Board of Editors has selected six influential pieces publis...
Book Chapter Richard W. Garnett, Good News Club v. Milford Central School ,in Oxford Companion to th...
When Earl Warren joined the Court as its fourteenth Chief Justice in 1953, Jim Crow ruled the South....
For more than two centuries, the U.S. Supreme Court has provided a battleground for nearly every con...
On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court decided in Brown v. Board of Education that state laws segregatin...
This study evolves around an attempt of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to induce the Congress to pa...
The literature on reform of the federal courts in 1937 understandably focuses on the history and con...
Correspondence from Victor H. Kramer commenting on Patrick Schlitz's review of Chief Justice Rehnqui...