In one of its last opinions of the 2010 term, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, in Stern v. Marshall, that Anna Nicole Smith, a former Playboy model and minor television celebrity, will get nothing from the estate of her late husband, J. Howard Marshall II, a billionaire Texas oil tycoon. This marks the end of a sixteen-year battle about whether J. Howard’s son, Pierce Marshall, wrongfully interfered with his father’s alleged plans to gift substantial sums of money and property to his new, and much younger, bride. In this column, I’ll explain the history of the litigation, including how it got all the way to the U.S Supreme Court (twice), and comment on why the Justices ruled as they did
The Supreme Court has had a very big year. Decisions from the Court’s most recent term, which ended ...
The testator had been married twice. By his first wife he had one child, the plaintiff. When he and ...
Stanley v. Illinois is one of the Supreme Courts more curious landmark cases. The holding is well kn...
Stern v. Marshall is arguably the biggest decision to affect the bankruptcy courts in almost thirty ...
In February 2007, the world had a ringside seat to a truly macabre fight. Under the glare of televis...
Article III of the Constitution grants federal district judges, appellate court judges, and Supreme ...
Divorces can often be ugly, acrimonious, and hard-fought. The divorce between Sue Ann and Harold Ham...
[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of ...
In Beeler v. Astrue, a recent case that I discussed at length in Part One of this series of columns,...
(Excerpt) In these unusually turbulent times for the presidency and Congress, the Supreme Court’s la...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In these unusually turbulent times for the presidency and Congress, the Supreme Court’s latest term ...
The author analyzes both the Fourth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Hustler Magazine...
[Extract] Early this year, the Supreme Court of New South Wales handed down its decision in Ashton v...
In 1980 the United States Supreme Court decided Trammel v. United States. The opinion changed the Sp...
The Supreme Court has had a very big year. Decisions from the Court’s most recent term, which ended ...
The testator had been married twice. By his first wife he had one child, the plaintiff. When he and ...
Stanley v. Illinois is one of the Supreme Courts more curious landmark cases. The holding is well kn...
Stern v. Marshall is arguably the biggest decision to affect the bankruptcy courts in almost thirty ...
In February 2007, the world had a ringside seat to a truly macabre fight. Under the glare of televis...
Article III of the Constitution grants federal district judges, appellate court judges, and Supreme ...
Divorces can often be ugly, acrimonious, and hard-fought. The divorce between Sue Ann and Harold Ham...
[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of ...
In Beeler v. Astrue, a recent case that I discussed at length in Part One of this series of columns,...
(Excerpt) In these unusually turbulent times for the presidency and Congress, the Supreme Court’s la...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In these unusually turbulent times for the presidency and Congress, the Supreme Court’s latest term ...
The author analyzes both the Fourth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Hustler Magazine...
[Extract] Early this year, the Supreme Court of New South Wales handed down its decision in Ashton v...
In 1980 the United States Supreme Court decided Trammel v. United States. The opinion changed the Sp...
The Supreme Court has had a very big year. Decisions from the Court’s most recent term, which ended ...
The testator had been married twice. By his first wife he had one child, the plaintiff. When he and ...
Stanley v. Illinois is one of the Supreme Courts more curious landmark cases. The holding is well kn...