The Court determined that (1) when seeking to maintain parental rights, parents have a right to bring material evidence rebutting a NRS 432B.450 presumption that a child is in need of protection; and (2) that district courts cannot rely on juvenile court findings of intentional abuse to terminate parental rights where such evidence has been improperly excluded
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
A parent’s rights to their children cannot be terminated because a parent struggles with substance a...
A parent\u27s constitutional right to raise his or her child is one of the most venerated liberty in...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order denying a petition to vacate an earlier c...
The Court reviewed an appeal based on the termination of an individual’s parental rights. The Court ...
The Court determined that (1) when a parent is deemed incompetent to stand a criminal trial, there i...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that (1) requiring a parent to admit guilt to a criminal act in order ...
An appeal from a district court order denying a petition for termination of parental rights
Appeal of a District Court order terminating the parental rights of both parents to their three chil...
The Court determined that parents who have terminated their parental rights do not have standing to ...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...
In a series of cases in the 1920s, the Supreme Court affirmed a fundamental right of parents to dire...
In criminal and delinquency proceedings against juveniles, who determines how much or how little a c...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
A parent’s rights to their children cannot be terminated because a parent struggles with substance a...
A parent\u27s constitutional right to raise his or her child is one of the most venerated liberty in...
The Court determined that termination of parental rights is valid when parents fail to take necessar...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order denying a petition to vacate an earlier c...
The Court reviewed an appeal based on the termination of an individual’s parental rights. The Court ...
The Court determined that (1) when a parent is deemed incompetent to stand a criminal trial, there i...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that (1) requiring a parent to admit guilt to a criminal act in order ...
An appeal from a district court order denying a petition for termination of parental rights
Appeal of a District Court order terminating the parental rights of both parents to their three chil...
The Court determined that parents who have terminated their parental rights do not have standing to ...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division’s termination ...
In a series of cases in the 1920s, the Supreme Court affirmed a fundamental right of parents to dire...
In criminal and delinquency proceedings against juveniles, who determines how much or how little a c...
A party requesting predicate factual findings under NRS 3.2203 must only show that such findings are...
A parent’s rights to their children cannot be terminated because a parent struggles with substance a...
A parent\u27s constitutional right to raise his or her child is one of the most venerated liberty in...