This article analyzes the Canadian court case of Eli Lilly v. Novopharm and the utility doctrine in Canada, and international standards of patent protection including TRIPS and NAFTA. The ‘‘promise of the patent’’ doctrine in Canada seeks to ensure that firms do not obtain a legal monopoly on the basis of speculative claims about increased utility — especially claims about therapeutic efficacy — that were unsubstantiated at the time of filing. Under this test, some of Eli Lilly’s patented pharmaceutical products have been invalidated retroactively
The current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of the export-oriented compulsory lic...
This article is an analysis of case law pertaining to whether scientific research in the lead-up to ...
The requirement that an invention have utility is one of the most fundamental of the patent laws. In...
This article analyzes the Canadian court case of Eli Lilly v. Novopharm and the utility doctrine i...
In 2012, Eli Lilly, a US pharmaceutical corporation, initiated an investor-state arbitral claim agai...
Normally the intellectual property is defined as “asset” (Frankel, 2016, p. 21) in FTAs that al...
Abstract Background In order to comply with the provi...
This Article examines the Eli Lilly v. Canada arbitration award and its potential impact on intellec...
Canada’s Patented Medicines (Notice Of Compliance) Regulations fail to achieve the intended purpose ...
New Zealand is party to several free trade agreements (FTAs), such as those with China, Malaysia, an...
In order to market and sell a new pharmaceutical drug in Canada, the Minister of Health requires the...
Free trade agreements (FTAs) and bilateral investment treaties (BITs) typically contain investment c...
Through the emergence of several high-profile investment arbitration cases, the effects of IPRs as i...
In 1994, the members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) adopted the Agreement on Trade-Related As...
Countries face a new threat that strikes at their ability to balance protection of intellectual prop...
The current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of the export-oriented compulsory lic...
This article is an analysis of case law pertaining to whether scientific research in the lead-up to ...
The requirement that an invention have utility is one of the most fundamental of the patent laws. In...
This article analyzes the Canadian court case of Eli Lilly v. Novopharm and the utility doctrine i...
In 2012, Eli Lilly, a US pharmaceutical corporation, initiated an investor-state arbitral claim agai...
Normally the intellectual property is defined as “asset” (Frankel, 2016, p. 21) in FTAs that al...
Abstract Background In order to comply with the provi...
This Article examines the Eli Lilly v. Canada arbitration award and its potential impact on intellec...
Canada’s Patented Medicines (Notice Of Compliance) Regulations fail to achieve the intended purpose ...
New Zealand is party to several free trade agreements (FTAs), such as those with China, Malaysia, an...
In order to market and sell a new pharmaceutical drug in Canada, the Minister of Health requires the...
Free trade agreements (FTAs) and bilateral investment treaties (BITs) typically contain investment c...
Through the emergence of several high-profile investment arbitration cases, the effects of IPRs as i...
In 1994, the members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) adopted the Agreement on Trade-Related As...
Countries face a new threat that strikes at their ability to balance protection of intellectual prop...
The current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of the export-oriented compulsory lic...
This article is an analysis of case law pertaining to whether scientific research in the lead-up to ...
The requirement that an invention have utility is one of the most fundamental of the patent laws. In...