Add to ORKGThis Article is about the misunderstood relationship between the Fourth Amendment and the positive law. It shows how state property law and other expressions of the positive law are more resilient and useful to Fourth Amendment analysis than the Court\u27s decisions of the past three decades recognize
This Article analyzes Florida v. Jardines, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a canine sniff of a...
This Article examines the central role that knowledge plays in determining the Fourth Amendment’s sc...
The attorney-client privilege is recognized in every state and in the federal judicial system. Yet d...
This Article is about the misunderstood relationship between the Fourth Amendment and the positive l...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
This Article considers the role of property rights in defining Fourth Amendment searches. Since Unit...
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts hav...
This is the published version.This article surveys significant trends in search and seizure law. Rec...
This Article rehearses a response to the problems posed to and by the Supreme Court\u27s attempts to...
The threat of future terrorist attacks has sped the proliferation of random, suspicionless searches ...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
This Article reports an attempt to investigate empirically important aspects of the Fourth Amendmen...
The text of the Fourth Amendment provides no guidance about what makes a search unreasonable or when...
This Article attempts at a minimum to offer a common background and frame of reference for defining ...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
This Article analyzes Florida v. Jardines, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a canine sniff of a...
This Article examines the central role that knowledge plays in determining the Fourth Amendment’s sc...
The attorney-client privilege is recognized in every state and in the federal judicial system. Yet d...
This Article is about the misunderstood relationship between the Fourth Amendment and the positive l...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
This Article considers the role of property rights in defining Fourth Amendment searches. Since Unit...
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts hav...
This is the published version.This article surveys significant trends in search and seizure law. Rec...
This Article rehearses a response to the problems posed to and by the Supreme Court\u27s attempts to...
The threat of future terrorist attacks has sped the proliferation of random, suspicionless searches ...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
This Article reports an attempt to investigate empirically important aspects of the Fourth Amendmen...
The text of the Fourth Amendment provides no guidance about what makes a search unreasonable or when...
This Article attempts at a minimum to offer a common background and frame of reference for defining ...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
This Article analyzes Florida v. Jardines, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a canine sniff of a...
This Article examines the central role that knowledge plays in determining the Fourth Amendment’s sc...
The attorney-client privilege is recognized in every state and in the federal judicial system. Yet d...