Add to ORKGWith a view to promoting a shared understanding of the proper approach to Article 1(F)(a) exclusion from refugee status, we have engaged in sustained collaborative study and reflection on relevant norms and state practice. Our research was debated and refined at the Sixth Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law, convened in March 2013 by the University of Michigan’s Program in Refugee and Asylum Law. These Guidelines are the product of that endeavor, and reflect the consensus of Colloquium participants on how decision makers can best ensure the application of Article 1(F)(a) in a manner that conforms to international legal principles
It is our hope that, as in the case of earlier Michigan Guidelines on the International Protection o...
This Article first questions the legitimacy of protection elsewhere practices. It then considers the...
A number of jurisdictions have fastened onto a solution that appears to reconcile respect for refu...
With a view to promoting a shared understanding of the proper approach to Article 1(F)(a) exclusion ...
Refugees increasingly encounter laws and policies which provide that their protection needs will be ...
The Michigan Guidelines on the International Protection of Refugees are the result of a collective e...
The focus of this contribution is Article 1(F)(a), a section of the exclusion clause that has increa...
The goal of the Sixth Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law was to develop a princip...
Despite the clear legal foundation of refugee freedom of movement at international law, states are a...
The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is the centre piece of international refugee ...
In many jurisdictions around the world, \u27internal flight\u27 or \u27internal relocation\u27 rules...
The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (“Convention”) recognizes as refugees those who, o...
International refugee law is designed only to provide a back-up source of protection to seriously at...
This chapter examines the exclusion provisions in article 1F of the Refugee Convention, which can on...
When is an applicant for refugee status “unworthy” of asylum? It used to be thought this question wa...
It is our hope that, as in the case of earlier Michigan Guidelines on the International Protection o...
This Article first questions the legitimacy of protection elsewhere practices. It then considers the...
A number of jurisdictions have fastened onto a solution that appears to reconcile respect for refu...
With a view to promoting a shared understanding of the proper approach to Article 1(F)(a) exclusion ...
Refugees increasingly encounter laws and policies which provide that their protection needs will be ...
The Michigan Guidelines on the International Protection of Refugees are the result of a collective e...
The focus of this contribution is Article 1(F)(a), a section of the exclusion clause that has increa...
The goal of the Sixth Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law was to develop a princip...
Despite the clear legal foundation of refugee freedom of movement at international law, states are a...
The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is the centre piece of international refugee ...
In many jurisdictions around the world, \u27internal flight\u27 or \u27internal relocation\u27 rules...
The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (“Convention”) recognizes as refugees those who, o...
International refugee law is designed only to provide a back-up source of protection to seriously at...
This chapter examines the exclusion provisions in article 1F of the Refugee Convention, which can on...
When is an applicant for refugee status “unworthy” of asylum? It used to be thought this question wa...
It is our hope that, as in the case of earlier Michigan Guidelines on the International Protection o...
This Article first questions the legitimacy of protection elsewhere practices. It then considers the...
A number of jurisdictions have fastened onto a solution that appears to reconcile respect for refu...