Until the passage of the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, which became effective in 1963, the Federal Government was not able to recover the expense of medical services extended to one who was entitled to those services when the injury was caused by the negligence of a third-party tortfeasor. The act now gives the Government the right to join in the suit of the injured party or to proceed on its own. Through co-operation with the injured parties\u27 attorneys, the Government has recouped millions of dollars
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The Act relates to personal injury cases against third parties brought by or on behalf of a person t...
Until the passage of the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, which became effective in 1963, the Fede...
Soon after the inception of the Hospital Recovery Claims Program, Government agencies concluded that...
Soon after the inception of the Hospital Recovery Claims Program, Government agencies concluded that...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that the government\u27s recovery of conditional Medicare payments should...
COMPENSATION FOR INJURIES CAUSED BY WRONGFUL ACT OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL...
The Act provides that any person who has received Medicaid benefits for treatment of injuries giving...
The Act provides that any person who has received Medicaid benefits for treatment of injuries giving...
A new brand of plaintiff has come to federal court. In cases involving the Affordable Care Act, the ...
In Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn, the United States Supreme Court approa...
The state Bureau of Medical Services is responsible for recovering money spent by the state under Me...
Because tort law generally and healthcare regulation specifically are traditional state functions an...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The Act relates to personal injury cases against third parties brought by or on behalf of a person t...
Until the passage of the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, which became effective in 1963, the Fede...
Soon after the inception of the Hospital Recovery Claims Program, Government agencies concluded that...
Soon after the inception of the Hospital Recovery Claims Program, Government agencies concluded that...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that the government\u27s recovery of conditional Medicare payments should...
COMPENSATION FOR INJURIES CAUSED BY WRONGFUL ACT OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL...
The Act provides that any person who has received Medicaid benefits for treatment of injuries giving...
The Act provides that any person who has received Medicaid benefits for treatment of injuries giving...
A new brand of plaintiff has come to federal court. In cases involving the Affordable Care Act, the ...
In Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. Ahlborn, the United States Supreme Court approa...
The state Bureau of Medical Services is responsible for recovering money spent by the state under Me...
Because tort law generally and healthcare regulation specifically are traditional state functions an...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The legal and medical communities have debated the impact and necessity of medical liability reform ...
The Act relates to personal injury cases against third parties brought by or on behalf of a person t...