In this case, the Nevada Supreme Court reviews the district court’s interpretation of a contractual covenant not to compete and a liquidated damages clause. The Court states that unless clearly erroneous, it will affirm a district court’s decision on whether a contract was breached or not. However, the Court does not have to use the district court’s construction of a contract to make that determination. The Court may use independent appellate review to construe contracts
Vestin Funds sought compensation on a loan from the guarantors of the loan Frederick Waid and M. Naf...
This case was an appeal from a district court order denying Plaintiff/Appellant’s petition for judic...
Petitioner Nevada Power Company (NPC) filed a writ petition challenging the district court’s jurisdi...
Appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review of the appeals officer’s d...
Appeal from district court’s award of attorney fees and costs in favor of Camden pursuant to a rejec...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s holding that the purposes behind the exceptio...
This case was an appeal from an order denying a new trial on a construction defects case brought und...
The Court reviewed a jury instruction regarding the determination of fair market value of condemned ...
The Court considered Brown’s appeal from a district court’s order statistically closing her employme...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that non-compete agreements cannot extend further than what is reasona...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
Rewritten decision for prior June 2008 decision on a petition for rehearing in a case where the Neva...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
Two pharmaceutical wholesalers appeal from the district court’s denial of a petition for judicial re...
Vestin Funds sought compensation on a loan from the guarantors of the loan Frederick Waid and M. Naf...
This case was an appeal from a district court order denying Plaintiff/Appellant’s petition for judic...
Petitioner Nevada Power Company (NPC) filed a writ petition challenging the district court’s jurisdi...
Appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review of the appeals officer’s d...
Appeal from district court’s award of attorney fees and costs in favor of Camden pursuant to a rejec...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s holding that the purposes behind the exceptio...
This case was an appeal from an order denying a new trial on a construction defects case brought und...
The Court reviewed a jury instruction regarding the determination of fair market value of condemned ...
The Court considered Brown’s appeal from a district court’s order statistically closing her employme...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that non-compete agreements cannot extend further than what is reasona...
The Court considered a writ of mandamus challenging district court orders denying summary judgment o...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
Rewritten decision for prior June 2008 decision on a petition for rehearing in a case where the Neva...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
Two pharmaceutical wholesalers appeal from the district court’s denial of a petition for judicial re...
Vestin Funds sought compensation on a loan from the guarantors of the loan Frederick Waid and M. Naf...
This case was an appeal from a district court order denying Plaintiff/Appellant’s petition for judic...
Petitioner Nevada Power Company (NPC) filed a writ petition challenging the district court’s jurisdi...