Add to ORKGWhether the district court abused its discretion in admitting prior bad act evidence because (1) it did not fall within the common-plan-or-scheme exception or because (2) its probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice
The Court determined three issues: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction...
The Court held that it is a constitutional error when the district court fails to notify and confer ...
The Court determined three issues: 1) whether a district court can amend a presentence investigation...
This case is an appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court judgment of conviction of first-degre...
District court convictions for first-degree murder and sexual penetration of a dead body reversed an...
The Court determined that (1) the State presented sufficient evidence for a jury to convict Guitron ...
Defendant-Appellant argued that the district court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the grand...
In this case, the Court considered two issues related to DUI charges against appellant. First, wheth...
Appeal from order of dismissal of indecent exposure charges, after the district court judge conclude...
Appeal from a conviction, by jury, of two counts of preventing or dissuading a person from testifyin...
The Court determined whether the district court properly excluded evidence seized pursuant to a sear...
An appeal addressing whether a district court committed reversible error by dismissing a prospective...
The Court upheld that the exclusion of expert testimony is left to the district court’s wide discret...
Garrett\u27s disturbing outcome is the most egregious in a series of decisions promulgated by the Te...
The Court considered whether a concession-of-guilt strategy is equivalent to a guilty plea, thus req...
The Court determined three issues: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction...
The Court held that it is a constitutional error when the district court fails to notify and confer ...
The Court determined three issues: 1) whether a district court can amend a presentence investigation...
This case is an appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court judgment of conviction of first-degre...
District court convictions for first-degree murder and sexual penetration of a dead body reversed an...
The Court determined that (1) the State presented sufficient evidence for a jury to convict Guitron ...
Defendant-Appellant argued that the district court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the grand...
In this case, the Court considered two issues related to DUI charges against appellant. First, wheth...
Appeal from order of dismissal of indecent exposure charges, after the district court judge conclude...
Appeal from a conviction, by jury, of two counts of preventing or dissuading a person from testifyin...
The Court determined whether the district court properly excluded evidence seized pursuant to a sear...
An appeal addressing whether a district court committed reversible error by dismissing a prospective...
The Court upheld that the exclusion of expert testimony is left to the district court’s wide discret...
Garrett\u27s disturbing outcome is the most egregious in a series of decisions promulgated by the Te...
The Court considered whether a concession-of-guilt strategy is equivalent to a guilty plea, thus req...
The Court determined three issues: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction...
The Court held that it is a constitutional error when the district court fails to notify and confer ...
The Court determined three issues: 1) whether a district court can amend a presentence investigation...