This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Robers v. United States. The Supreme Court will have the opportunity to resolve a major circuit split concerning how to value restitution owed to victims of mortgage lending fraud. Specifically, the court will determine whether the value of collateral mortgage property at the time of foreclosure is used to offset how much restitution fraudulent borrowers owe their victims, or whether the value of only the actual cash proceeds received from foreclosure of the property is used to offset restitution
Mandatory restitution awards for child victims of sex crimes and child pornography now include futur...
For many decades, healthy levels of residential mortgage loans (“RMLs”) and their regulation have be...
An important functional difference among restitutionary remedies is between giving a plaintiff the m...
The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are split on how to calculate restitution in a criminal ...
of redemption – Nature and scope of – When can be exercised and when extinguished – Held: Right of r...
Trillions of dollars were lost when the mortgage and housing bubble burst in the late 2000s. Some of...
Prior to the passage of the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) in 1968, consumers were vulnerable to many d...
This article discusses a California case which held that an identity theft victim in whose name a mo...
The due-on-sale clause is a mortgage provision that affords the mortgagee the right to accelerate th...
This study analyses certain controversial issues commonly arising when a claim for restitution is br...
Creditors have more than a dozen prejudgment, no-notice remedies which permit them to seize or encum...
Criminal restitution is a standard part of sentencing. As criminal restitution obligations have beco...
Discusses the Supreme Court ruling in AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors on the compen...
This article explores the question left unanswered by the Supreme Court\u27s January, 2005, decision...
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) provides for two primary civil remedies for aggrieved borrowers who ...
Mandatory restitution awards for child victims of sex crimes and child pornography now include futur...
For many decades, healthy levels of residential mortgage loans (“RMLs”) and their regulation have be...
An important functional difference among restitutionary remedies is between giving a plaintiff the m...
The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are split on how to calculate restitution in a criminal ...
of redemption – Nature and scope of – When can be exercised and when extinguished – Held: Right of r...
Trillions of dollars were lost when the mortgage and housing bubble burst in the late 2000s. Some of...
Prior to the passage of the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) in 1968, consumers were vulnerable to many d...
This article discusses a California case which held that an identity theft victim in whose name a mo...
The due-on-sale clause is a mortgage provision that affords the mortgagee the right to accelerate th...
This study analyses certain controversial issues commonly arising when a claim for restitution is br...
Creditors have more than a dozen prejudgment, no-notice remedies which permit them to seize or encum...
Criminal restitution is a standard part of sentencing. As criminal restitution obligations have beco...
Discusses the Supreme Court ruling in AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors on the compen...
This article explores the question left unanswered by the Supreme Court\u27s January, 2005, decision...
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) provides for two primary civil remedies for aggrieved borrowers who ...
Mandatory restitution awards for child victims of sex crimes and child pornography now include futur...
For many decades, healthy levels of residential mortgage loans (“RMLs”) and their regulation have be...
An important functional difference among restitutionary remedies is between giving a plaintiff the m...