(Excerpt) This Note argues that the scope of CDA § 230, which provides immunity to Internet Service Providers in defamation suits for content posted by third-party users, should be narrowed in circumstances where a website actively solicits malicious content from its users. Part I discusses gossip websites and blogs that are currently immunized by § 230 and analyzes social issues that result from the broad interpretation of the CDA. Part II briefly discusses the law of defamation, followed by a discussion of the policies behind the CDA’s enactment, and the statute’s current scope in regard to defamation suits. Part III analyzes the flaws of the different approaches currently employed by the courts to determine whether a website qualifies fo...
Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act (“CDA”) grants sweeping immunity to interactive compute...
In an initial attempt to shield minors from pornography, Congress enacted the Communications Decency...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) offers broad protection for providers and users ...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that the scope of CDA § 230, which provides immunity to Internet Service ...
This Note highlights the growing concern of Internet defamation and the lack of viable legal remedie...
Congress enacted the CDA as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, due to concerns over pornogr...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) was enacted following the controversial decision...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was originally intended to promote online innovation f...
In 1989, the “world wide web” launched in the public domain, creating what we call today the “intern...
In an effort to remove the disincentives to self-regulation created by the decision in Stratton Oakm...
In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet users a...
In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet users a...
In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet users a...
When Congress enacted § 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("CDA")1 it changed the lan...
What do a revenge pornographer, gossip-site curator, and platform pairing predators with young peopl...
Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act (“CDA”) grants sweeping immunity to interactive compute...
In an initial attempt to shield minors from pornography, Congress enacted the Communications Decency...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) offers broad protection for providers and users ...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that the scope of CDA § 230, which provides immunity to Internet Service ...
This Note highlights the growing concern of Internet defamation and the lack of viable legal remedie...
Congress enacted the CDA as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, due to concerns over pornogr...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) was enacted following the controversial decision...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was originally intended to promote online innovation f...
In 1989, the “world wide web” launched in the public domain, creating what we call today the “intern...
In an effort to remove the disincentives to self-regulation created by the decision in Stratton Oakm...
In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet users a...
In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet users a...
In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet users a...
When Congress enacted § 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("CDA")1 it changed the lan...
What do a revenge pornographer, gossip-site curator, and platform pairing predators with young peopl...
Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act (“CDA”) grants sweeping immunity to interactive compute...
In an initial attempt to shield minors from pornography, Congress enacted the Communications Decency...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) offers broad protection for providers and users ...