Although parole release guidelines have achieved many of the advantages of determinate sentencing, they raise troublesome issues. Subject to important caveats, the author maintains that sentencing guidelines can better be administered by courts than by parole boards. He also maintains that current federal parole guidelines unfairly disregard plea bargained charge reductions, and that the construction of equitable guidelines requires detailed offense-by-offense and situation-by-situation studies that have not yet been undertaken
Prosecutors control statutory ranges by selecting charges. In addition, prosecutors decide whether t...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Over the past 30 years, many states have abolished parole boards, which traditionally have had the d...
Although parole release guidelines have achieved many of the advantages of determinate sentencing, t...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In the past fifteen years an almost unanimous c...
The federal sentencing guidelines have received sustained criticism from scholars, judges, and pract...
Judge Marvin Frankel’s writings in the early 1970s inspired the creation of sentencing guidelines co...
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were created with two broad goals in mind. One, of course, was to ...
In 1984 the Sentencing Reform Act was passed, ending fully discretionary sentencing by judges and al...
desert ' should be the primary aim of sentencing policy and that the aims of deterrence and reh...
Parole boards evaluate the public safety risk posed by parole-eligible prisoners to determine whethe...
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sent...
The theoretical shortcomings of indeterminate sentencing have been well documented, but less attenti...
For the last twenty years, much of the discussion about the criminal justice system has focused on c...
This Note analyses the failures of the Sentencing Reform Act in light of high recidivism rates and t...
Prosecutors control statutory ranges by selecting charges. In addition, prosecutors decide whether t...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Over the past 30 years, many states have abolished parole boards, which traditionally have had the d...
Although parole release guidelines have achieved many of the advantages of determinate sentencing, t...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In the past fifteen years an almost unanimous c...
The federal sentencing guidelines have received sustained criticism from scholars, judges, and pract...
Judge Marvin Frankel’s writings in the early 1970s inspired the creation of sentencing guidelines co...
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were created with two broad goals in mind. One, of course, was to ...
In 1984 the Sentencing Reform Act was passed, ending fully discretionary sentencing by judges and al...
desert ' should be the primary aim of sentencing policy and that the aims of deterrence and reh...
Parole boards evaluate the public safety risk posed by parole-eligible prisoners to determine whethe...
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sent...
The theoretical shortcomings of indeterminate sentencing have been well documented, but less attenti...
For the last twenty years, much of the discussion about the criminal justice system has focused on c...
This Note analyses the failures of the Sentencing Reform Act in light of high recidivism rates and t...
Prosecutors control statutory ranges by selecting charges. In addition, prosecutors decide whether t...
For many years, the sentencing process of the criminal justice system sought to achieve four goals: ...
Over the past 30 years, many states have abolished parole boards, which traditionally have had the d...