Though I think the civil recourse critique of the leading conceptions of corrective justice is in some respects misguided, I do not want to join up to the thrust and parry here. My aim in this Article is to show that there is a better conception of corrective justice than the ones that Goldberg and Zipursky target, that this conception of corrective justice is untouched by the civil recourse critique, and that civil recourse is best understood as a corrective justice account of tort. In other words, I aim to explain corrective justice for civil recourse theorists
This thesis seeks to justify on moral grounds the existence of tort systems. The argument is that co...
This article argues that corrective justice is an adequate principle of criminalization. On my inter...
Tort regimes are founded upon a number of different theories of social justice. In this article, the...
This essay responds to the extensive and thoughtful commentary on civil recourse theory provided by ...
In a recent book, I set out the contours of a conception of corrective justice, and tentatively expl...
The purpose of this article is to develop a pragmatic analysis of corrective justice that will serve...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
The latest prominent theory of torts is the rich “civil recourse” theory of Professors John C. P. Go...
In a recent book, I set out the contours of a conception of corrective justice, and tentatively expl...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
John Goldberg and Ben Zipursky’s civil recourse theory purports to be descriptive and unitary. It ca...
This thesis seeks to justify on moral grounds the existence of tort systems. The argument is that co...
In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky discuss the connection between t...
In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky discuss the connection between t...
This thesis seeks to justify on moral grounds the existence of tort systems. The argument is that co...
This article argues that corrective justice is an adequate principle of criminalization. On my inter...
Tort regimes are founded upon a number of different theories of social justice. In this article, the...
This essay responds to the extensive and thoughtful commentary on civil recourse theory provided by ...
In a recent book, I set out the contours of a conception of corrective justice, and tentatively expl...
The purpose of this article is to develop a pragmatic analysis of corrective justice that will serve...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
The latest prominent theory of torts is the rich “civil recourse” theory of Professors John C. P. Go...
In a recent book, I set out the contours of a conception of corrective justice, and tentatively expl...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
John Goldberg and Ben Zipursky’s civil recourse theory purports to be descriptive and unitary. It ca...
This thesis seeks to justify on moral grounds the existence of tort systems. The argument is that co...
In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky discuss the connection between t...
In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky discuss the connection between t...
This thesis seeks to justify on moral grounds the existence of tort systems. The argument is that co...
This article argues that corrective justice is an adequate principle of criminalization. On my inter...
Tort regimes are founded upon a number of different theories of social justice. In this article, the...