Professor Blumstein\u27s timely article deals with two competing paradigms that provide the poles in the spectrum of legal liability regimes. The professional or scientific model of liability assumes a rigidly normative approach to medical practice while the second more recent paradigm reflects the principles of marketplace economics in considering cost and resource availability to determine quality of care standards. Professor Blumstein concludes that the traditional approach to determining legal liability is being eroded by both the economics of managed care and the recent emphasis on systemic management of health care to promote patient safety, and that the traditional regime will have to bend in order to remain legally viable
This note will use the principles of law and economics to examine the interaction of market structur...
Over the years, the United States health care system has undergone a transformation from a market co...
This article seeks to examine the conflict between non-cost-conscious medical malpractice liability ...
Professor Blumstein\u27s timely article deals with two competing paradigms that provide the poles in...
Despite the emergence of managed health care and the resulting dramatic change in the role of the th...
This article uses the tools of law and economics analysis to assess the recent evolution in liabilit...
The academic community has largely reached a consensus that medical malpractice reform is unlikely t...
With the United States embroiled in its third major medical malpractice crisis in the past thirty ye...
In this article, the authors examine the potential of enterprise liability in light of current healt...
Medical malpractice lawsuits are by far the most numerous of the professional negligence cases.1 Acc...
Physicians and other medical providers are subject to a negligence rule of liability. In a simple mo...
In this article, the author proposes that the traditional custom-based standard applicable in medica...
Despite the fundamental role of deterrence in justifying a system of medical malpractice law, surpri...
“Enterprise medical liability” is a term used to describe a system in which health care organization...
In health care, overuse and underuse of medical treatments represent equally dangerous deviations fr...
This note will use the principles of law and economics to examine the interaction of market structur...
Over the years, the United States health care system has undergone a transformation from a market co...
This article seeks to examine the conflict between non-cost-conscious medical malpractice liability ...
Professor Blumstein\u27s timely article deals with two competing paradigms that provide the poles in...
Despite the emergence of managed health care and the resulting dramatic change in the role of the th...
This article uses the tools of law and economics analysis to assess the recent evolution in liabilit...
The academic community has largely reached a consensus that medical malpractice reform is unlikely t...
With the United States embroiled in its third major medical malpractice crisis in the past thirty ye...
In this article, the authors examine the potential of enterprise liability in light of current healt...
Medical malpractice lawsuits are by far the most numerous of the professional negligence cases.1 Acc...
Physicians and other medical providers are subject to a negligence rule of liability. In a simple mo...
In this article, the author proposes that the traditional custom-based standard applicable in medica...
Despite the fundamental role of deterrence in justifying a system of medical malpractice law, surpri...
“Enterprise medical liability” is a term used to describe a system in which health care organization...
In health care, overuse and underuse of medical treatments represent equally dangerous deviations fr...
This note will use the principles of law and economics to examine the interaction of market structur...
Over the years, the United States health care system has undergone a transformation from a market co...
This article seeks to examine the conflict between non-cost-conscious medical malpractice liability ...