Add to ORKGThis article addresses the model of the problem-solving courts, beginning with the 1989 Dade County, Florida drug court and the role of the pro-active problem solving judge as presented by Judge Lederman of the Dade County drug court. The article reviews the role of the pro-active problem-solving judge in light of the defendants due process rights. After reviewing several case studies, transcripts, and literature on the issue, the article concludes that problem-solving judging and lawyering need not be in conflict with due process standards
This chapter reflects on the history and development of the problem-solving court model, including t...
Thirty years after the start of the first drug court, it is a good time to examine what the problem-...
The introduction of Drug Courts and other problem-solving courts has brought significant change to t...
The rapid proliferation of problem-solving courts, particularly of drug courts, occasions this Art...
In recent years, an array of specialized “problem-solving courts ” has emerged throughout the countr...
Problem-solving courts provide judicially supervised treatment for behavioral health needs commonly ...
In light of recent criticisms in the US and Australia, this article considers the risks involved in ...
Although there is broad consensus on what constitutes procedural due process in criminal cases, in c...
Problem-solving courts, such as drug and mental health courts, function under the model of therapeut...
Court costs, resource-intensive trials, booming prison populations and the obduracy of recidivism ra...
In the more than 30 years since the drug court model transformed the criminal justice landscape, pro...
Five years ago the term “problemsolving courts” was not commonly used or understood in the court com...
Manifest injustice is that state of affairs when an inmate comes to realize that his/her due process...
This article is the first to develop a problem-solving theory for the civil justice system. Drug cou...
This article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Gault, t...
This chapter reflects on the history and development of the problem-solving court model, including t...
Thirty years after the start of the first drug court, it is a good time to examine what the problem-...
The introduction of Drug Courts and other problem-solving courts has brought significant change to t...
The rapid proliferation of problem-solving courts, particularly of drug courts, occasions this Art...
In recent years, an array of specialized “problem-solving courts ” has emerged throughout the countr...
Problem-solving courts provide judicially supervised treatment for behavioral health needs commonly ...
In light of recent criticisms in the US and Australia, this article considers the risks involved in ...
Although there is broad consensus on what constitutes procedural due process in criminal cases, in c...
Problem-solving courts, such as drug and mental health courts, function under the model of therapeut...
Court costs, resource-intensive trials, booming prison populations and the obduracy of recidivism ra...
In the more than 30 years since the drug court model transformed the criminal justice landscape, pro...
Five years ago the term “problemsolving courts” was not commonly used or understood in the court com...
Manifest injustice is that state of affairs when an inmate comes to realize that his/her due process...
This article is the first to develop a problem-solving theory for the civil justice system. Drug cou...
This article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Gault, t...
This chapter reflects on the history and development of the problem-solving court model, including t...
Thirty years after the start of the first drug court, it is a good time to examine what the problem-...
The introduction of Drug Courts and other problem-solving courts has brought significant change to t...