Add to ORKGArticle discusses how the United States Supreme Court has limited access of civil rights litigants to the federal courts through expanded use of res judicata. Article discusses availability of federal forum to civil rights claimants who commence actions under sections 1981 and 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
Georgia Patsy, a white female secretary, brought a civil rights action under section 1983 of title 4...
The Supreme Court has taken an inconsistent approach to allowing vicarious liability under major civ...
One of the most significant developments in civil rights litigation is the expansion of immunity doc...
The Supreme Court recently limited Congress’s ability to pass civil rights statutes for the protecti...
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
The Supreme Court held that federal judicial abstention may be inappropriate where violation of firs...
The United States Supreme Court promulgated the 1983 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...
Inmates confined to correctional facilities have necessarily forfeited many of their civil rights. B...
The United States has recently been engaged in some of the largest civil rights movements since the ...
Two civil rights cases, of particular significance as we commemorate the fortieth anniversary of the...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctri...
Federal Courts and Civil Rights: Juidice v. Vail is a Deep Dive into the story of Juidice v. Vail, t...
For the first time in sixty years, the Supreme Court in Georgia v. Rachel and City of Greenwood v. P...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
Georgia Patsy, a white female secretary, brought a civil rights action under section 1983 of title 4...
The Supreme Court has taken an inconsistent approach to allowing vicarious liability under major civ...
One of the most significant developments in civil rights litigation is the expansion of immunity doc...
The Supreme Court recently limited Congress’s ability to pass civil rights statutes for the protecti...
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
The Supreme Court held that federal judicial abstention may be inappropriate where violation of firs...
The United States Supreme Court promulgated the 1983 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...
Inmates confined to correctional facilities have necessarily forfeited many of their civil rights. B...
The United States has recently been engaged in some of the largest civil rights movements since the ...
Two civil rights cases, of particular significance as we commemorate the fortieth anniversary of the...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the Younger abstention doctri...
Federal Courts and Civil Rights: Juidice v. Vail is a Deep Dive into the story of Juidice v. Vail, t...
For the first time in sixty years, the Supreme Court in Georgia v. Rachel and City of Greenwood v. P...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
Georgia Patsy, a white female secretary, brought a civil rights action under section 1983 of title 4...
The Supreme Court has taken an inconsistent approach to allowing vicarious liability under major civ...