Add to ORKGThis Article addresses the concerns over the differences in the right to counsel in family law cases depending on the venue. In New York, persons in family court proceedings have a constitutional right to counsel. Yet the same matter, if heard in the New York Supreme Court, does not afford such a right. This Article advocates the correction of this perceived oversight in the law so that all parties in these important proceedings can receive fair representation
This Article explores whether the optimistic prospect suggested by this experience—of reform that pr...
This case note examines the New York Court of Appeals\u27 decision in People v. Hobson, 39 N.Y.2d 47...
On November 1, 2008, the New York State Bar Association House of Delegates approved a resolution aff...
This Article addresses the concerns over the differences in the right to counsel in family law cases...
Family law courts in America are overwhelmed with self-represented parties who try their best to nav...
Family law courts in America are overwhelmed with self-represented parties who try their best to nav...
This Comment evaluates New York City’s framework for assigning counsel to Family Court litigants, kn...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
This Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clau...
From time to time, the Supreme Court chooses to hear a case addressing a family law issue. The famil...
A conventional reading of United States Supreme Court rulings on the right to counsel in civil cases...
Many of the leading constitutional issues of our day implicate family law matters. Modern substantiv...
On July 6, 2006, the Court of Appeals of New York decided Hernandez v. Robles. At issue in that case...
Family Law is basically state law. While federal law mandates child support guidelines, state law se...
This Article explores whether the optimistic prospect suggested by this experience—of reform that pr...
This case note examines the New York Court of Appeals\u27 decision in People v. Hobson, 39 N.Y.2d 47...
On November 1, 2008, the New York State Bar Association House of Delegates approved a resolution aff...
This Article addresses the concerns over the differences in the right to counsel in family law cases...
Family law courts in America are overwhelmed with self-represented parties who try their best to nav...
Family law courts in America are overwhelmed with self-represented parties who try their best to nav...
This Comment evaluates New York City’s framework for assigning counsel to Family Court litigants, kn...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
This Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clau...
From time to time, the Supreme Court chooses to hear a case addressing a family law issue. The famil...
A conventional reading of United States Supreme Court rulings on the right to counsel in civil cases...
Many of the leading constitutional issues of our day implicate family law matters. Modern substantiv...
On July 6, 2006, the Court of Appeals of New York decided Hernandez v. Robles. At issue in that case...
Family Law is basically state law. While federal law mandates child support guidelines, state law se...
This Article explores whether the optimistic prospect suggested by this experience—of reform that pr...
This case note examines the New York Court of Appeals\u27 decision in People v. Hobson, 39 N.Y.2d 47...
On November 1, 2008, the New York State Bar Association House of Delegates approved a resolution aff...