Add to ORKGThe AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the principle of confidentiality. Part I will deal with certain facets of the principle of confidentiality, not considered by the Court, in the light of a comparative analysis of the laws of the Member States. Finally, part II will analyse the impact of the Court’s ruling on both Community and national laws and briefly discuss the implications of the judgment for lawyers from third countries
Part I of this paper seeks to investigate the possible bias, or difference in usage, in the use of t...
Aquesta ponència forma part del Workshop internacional de doctorands organitzat pel Programa de Doct...
International audienceThis paper presents the paradoxical co-existence of secrecy and transparency i...
The AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the...
Although set against the background of investigations by the European Commission in proceedings for ...
The privilege in question has been developed by the Community Courts and it is also known as the “O...
This Article briefly describes the origin of the Community confidentiality standard, emphasizing the...
The main reasons why the importance of Legal Professional Privilege (‘LPP’) has been emphasised in p...
In a 1982 case the Court of Justice of the European Communities recognized the existence of an attor...
In common law jurisdictions, the right to protect confidentiality of communications between a profes...
I will focus my contribution on two distinct limitations on the Commision\u27s investigative rights ...
The concept of procedural fairness plays an important role in the enforcement of competition law, wh...
The article considers the issue of observance of legal secrecy in the decisions of the European Cour...
An effective legal system requires that confidentiality between client and attorney be protected. On...
The subject of the article is professional secrecy in practicing the legal profession in American la...
Part I of this paper seeks to investigate the possible bias, or difference in usage, in the use of t...
Aquesta ponència forma part del Workshop internacional de doctorands organitzat pel Programa de Doct...
International audienceThis paper presents the paradoxical co-existence of secrecy and transparency i...
The AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the...
Although set against the background of investigations by the European Commission in proceedings for ...
The privilege in question has been developed by the Community Courts and it is also known as the “O...
This Article briefly describes the origin of the Community confidentiality standard, emphasizing the...
The main reasons why the importance of Legal Professional Privilege (‘LPP’) has been emphasised in p...
In a 1982 case the Court of Justice of the European Communities recognized the existence of an attor...
In common law jurisdictions, the right to protect confidentiality of communications between a profes...
I will focus my contribution on two distinct limitations on the Commision\u27s investigative rights ...
The concept of procedural fairness plays an important role in the enforcement of competition law, wh...
The article considers the issue of observance of legal secrecy in the decisions of the European Cour...
An effective legal system requires that confidentiality between client and attorney be protected. On...
The subject of the article is professional secrecy in practicing the legal profession in American la...
Part I of this paper seeks to investigate the possible bias, or difference in usage, in the use of t...
Aquesta ponència forma part del Workshop internacional de doctorands organitzat pel Programa de Doct...
International audienceThis paper presents the paradoxical co-existence of secrecy and transparency i...