Add to ORKGThis brief essay reviews the contributions that social psychology is making the debate among criminal law theorists on the proper principle for the distribution of criminal liability and punishment. Included are a discussion of suggestions that deterrence may be ineffective as a distributive principle, that incapacitation of dangerous persons may be effective but might be more effective if pursued through a detention system distinct from the criminal justice system, and that desert as a distributive principle, ironically, might be the most effective for controlling crime. Available for download at http://ssrn.com/abstract=95613
Coordinating competing interests can be difficult. Because law regulates human behavior, it is a can...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Natu- ralism-the notion...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Naturalism—the notion t...
This brief essay reviews the contributions that social psychology is making the debate among crimina...
The behavioral sciences increasingly call into question the assumption of criminal law\u27s ex ante ...
Starting around 1974 the nothing works movement became dominant in the United States, and it joined ...
This lecture offers a broad review of current punishment theory debates and the alternative distribu...
Although punishment has been a crucial feature of every legal system, widespread disagreement exists...
This paper suggests how the information age might produce high capture and conviction rates and spec...
In criminal law circles, the accepted wisdom is that there are two and only two true justifications ...
ABSTRACT Corporal punishment, criminal penalties that are imposed on the body. The reasons which led...
This commentary examines the issue of judicial bias in response to the chapter, The Psychology of th...
This commentary examines the issue of judicial bias in response to the chapter, The Psychology of th...
There are good reasons to be initially hesitant about shaping criminal law rules to track the justic...
This article continues our project to apply groundbreaking new literature on the behavioral psycholo...
Coordinating competing interests can be difficult. Because law regulates human behavior, it is a can...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Natu- ralism-the notion...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Naturalism—the notion t...
This brief essay reviews the contributions that social psychology is making the debate among crimina...
The behavioral sciences increasingly call into question the assumption of criminal law\u27s ex ante ...
Starting around 1974 the nothing works movement became dominant in the United States, and it joined ...
This lecture offers a broad review of current punishment theory debates and the alternative distribu...
Although punishment has been a crucial feature of every legal system, widespread disagreement exists...
This paper suggests how the information age might produce high capture and conviction rates and spec...
In criminal law circles, the accepted wisdom is that there are two and only two true justifications ...
ABSTRACT Corporal punishment, criminal penalties that are imposed on the body. The reasons which led...
This commentary examines the issue of judicial bias in response to the chapter, The Psychology of th...
This commentary examines the issue of judicial bias in response to the chapter, The Psychology of th...
There are good reasons to be initially hesitant about shaping criminal law rules to track the justic...
This article continues our project to apply groundbreaking new literature on the behavioral psycholo...
Coordinating competing interests can be difficult. Because law regulates human behavior, it is a can...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Natu- ralism-the notion...
In this Article, we critique the increasingly prominent claims of Punishment Naturalism—the notion t...