In 2004, two cases on exchanges of information between competitors were decided by the Italian competition authority (“AGCM” – the Autorità Garante per la Concorrenza ed il Mercato). This revived a lively debate on the conditions in which these practices should be prohibited and whether they are anticompetitive per se. Over the years, the AGCM has taken a firm stand against such practices, in some cases beyond that taken by the European Commission and the European Court. This article reviews the rules and outlines the innovative approach that the AGCM has recently adopted
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
INFORMATION EXCHANGE AS AN ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT: THIN ICE BETWEEN GOOD AND BAD INFORMATION EXCH...
Dans un environnement de plus en plus complexe, le besoin d'information des entreprises les incite à...
The following motes critically summarise and assess the main findings of the Section “Review of Ital...
In these notes I will review and critically assess the main antitrust decisions taken by the Italia...
Communication between competing undertakings comes in different guises: It is an indispensable and i...
On one hand, under competition law, information exchange behaviour rules out the possibility for fir...
The first three months of this year have witnessed extensive enforcement activity by Italy’s Autorit...
The paper focuses on the relationship between abuses of dominance and information sharing as it aris...
This paper considers which circumstances constitute an infringement of Article 101 of the Treaty on ...
These notes provide some introductory notes to the detailed reviews of the main developments in publ...
The central role of the Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) in the Italian competition law enforcem...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
INFORMATION EXCHANGE AS AN ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT: THIN ICE BETWEEN GOOD AND BAD INFORMATION EXCH...
Dans un environnement de plus en plus complexe, le besoin d'information des entreprises les incite à...
The following motes critically summarise and assess the main findings of the Section “Review of Ital...
In these notes I will review and critically assess the main antitrust decisions taken by the Italia...
Communication between competing undertakings comes in different guises: It is an indispensable and i...
On one hand, under competition law, information exchange behaviour rules out the possibility for fir...
The first three months of this year have witnessed extensive enforcement activity by Italy’s Autorit...
The paper focuses on the relationship between abuses of dominance and information sharing as it aris...
This paper considers which circumstances constitute an infringement of Article 101 of the Treaty on ...
These notes provide some introductory notes to the detailed reviews of the main developments in publ...
The central role of the Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) in the Italian competition law enforcem...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
This paper employs an econometric methodology (the Panzar-Rosse H-statistic) to test the level of co...
INFORMATION EXCHANGE AS AN ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENT: THIN ICE BETWEEN GOOD AND BAD INFORMATION EXCH...
Dans un environnement de plus en plus complexe, le besoin d'information des entreprises les incite à...