This Article addresses the problem of leveling down as a response to discrimination. Existing case law and legal scholarship generally assume that inequality may be remedied in one of two ways: improving the lot of the disfavored group to match that of the most favored group, or worsening the treatment of the favored group until they fare as badly as everyone else. The term “leveling down” refers to the latter response. This Article contends that courts and commentators have overstated the flexibility of equality rights in accepting leveling down as a response to inequality, and proposes a new framework that focuses on the expressive meaning of leveling down and its compatibility with a norm of equal concern. It concludes with a section dem...
The question “what is equality?”, applied to the distribution of resources across races, suggests th...
It has been 20 years since section 15 of the Charter came into force. In this paper, Professor Hogg ...
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 21(3) of Peace and Conflict: Jou...
Existing case law and legal scholarship assume that inequality may be remedied in one of two ways: i...
Constitutional equality law has a two-way ratchet problem. When someone demonstrates that a governm...
Egalitarians were once often accused of wishing to ‘level down’; bringing everyone down to a lower l...
The problem of how best to resolve reverse discrimination questions under the equal protection cla...
The theme of this Article for the SMU Law Review Forum focuses us on the challenges faced by the “ec...
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that as one descends the socio-economic gradient, people s...
The Levelling-Down Objection is a standard objection to monistic egalitarian theories where equality...
In addition, the author note should have included a license statement, which is provided in this cor...
In addition, the author note should have included a license statement, which is provided in this cor...
Sex inequality still exists. However, its manifestations have evolved since the early sex inequality...
The call of this symposium was for articles regarding women\u27s rights and the movement toward equa...
What does it mean to treat people as equals when the legacies of feudalism, religious persecution, a...
The question “what is equality?”, applied to the distribution of resources across races, suggests th...
It has been 20 years since section 15 of the Charter came into force. In this paper, Professor Hogg ...
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 21(3) of Peace and Conflict: Jou...
Existing case law and legal scholarship assume that inequality may be remedied in one of two ways: i...
Constitutional equality law has a two-way ratchet problem. When someone demonstrates that a governm...
Egalitarians were once often accused of wishing to ‘level down’; bringing everyone down to a lower l...
The problem of how best to resolve reverse discrimination questions under the equal protection cla...
The theme of this Article for the SMU Law Review Forum focuses us on the challenges faced by the “ec...
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that as one descends the socio-economic gradient, people s...
The Levelling-Down Objection is a standard objection to monistic egalitarian theories where equality...
In addition, the author note should have included a license statement, which is provided in this cor...
In addition, the author note should have included a license statement, which is provided in this cor...
Sex inequality still exists. However, its manifestations have evolved since the early sex inequality...
The call of this symposium was for articles regarding women\u27s rights and the movement toward equa...
What does it mean to treat people as equals when the legacies of feudalism, religious persecution, a...
The question “what is equality?”, applied to the distribution of resources across races, suggests th...
It has been 20 years since section 15 of the Charter came into force. In this paper, Professor Hogg ...
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 21(3) of Peace and Conflict: Jou...