A timely piece proposing solutions for issues certain to be raised in the upcoming trials of the accused Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives captured in Afghanistan and detained on a U.S. military base in Cuba. In the article, I begin by examining the history and jurisdiction of Article I and Article III courts and then address the history and structure of the Al Qaeda and Taliban regimes. After considering the Constitution, federal statutes, politics, and geographical limitations, I conclude that Al Qaeda detainees should be tried in Article III courts under terrorism statutes and Taliban detainees, as military combatants, should be tried in Article I tribunals
This article discusses the unique and perhaps bizarre litigation surrounding the detainees held in G...
Detainees in the War on Terror have been at Guantanamo Bay for over a decade. The justification for ...
The stage for the Guantanamo detainees’ commission proceedings was set by the interplay between the ...
In the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, the United States has held suspected terrorist detai...
In early 2002, the United States began transporting prisoners captured in Afghanistan to the naval b...
This Article touches on the choice of whether to use the language and tools of war or the language a...
As Marty Lederman’s earlier post explains, a D.C. district court is now considering the habeas petit...
The United States of America has in its custody several hundred Taliban and Al Qaeda combatants who ...
The United States is at war against al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. Over the pas...
President Obama has made clear that the United States must grapple with questions of how to detain a...
In October 2012, a panel of the D.C. Circuit dealt a blow to the United States’ post- September 11, ...
Neither the law of war nor the criminal law, alone or in combination, provides an adequate legal str...
The September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States shocked the world\u27s conscience and changed th...
In the wake of the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, how to apprehe...
Although the conflict formerly known as the “war on terror” is now in its eighth year, key legal iss...
This article discusses the unique and perhaps bizarre litigation surrounding the detainees held in G...
Detainees in the War on Terror have been at Guantanamo Bay for over a decade. The justification for ...
The stage for the Guantanamo detainees’ commission proceedings was set by the interplay between the ...
In the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, the United States has held suspected terrorist detai...
In early 2002, the United States began transporting prisoners captured in Afghanistan to the naval b...
This Article touches on the choice of whether to use the language and tools of war or the language a...
As Marty Lederman’s earlier post explains, a D.C. district court is now considering the habeas petit...
The United States of America has in its custody several hundred Taliban and Al Qaeda combatants who ...
The United States is at war against al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. Over the pas...
President Obama has made clear that the United States must grapple with questions of how to detain a...
In October 2012, a panel of the D.C. Circuit dealt a blow to the United States’ post- September 11, ...
Neither the law of war nor the criminal law, alone or in combination, provides an adequate legal str...
The September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States shocked the world\u27s conscience and changed th...
In the wake of the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, how to apprehe...
Although the conflict formerly known as the “war on terror” is now in its eighth year, key legal iss...
This article discusses the unique and perhaps bizarre litigation surrounding the detainees held in G...
Detainees in the War on Terror have been at Guantanamo Bay for over a decade. The justification for ...
The stage for the Guantanamo detainees’ commission proceedings was set by the interplay between the ...