This article explores the clash between federal policies encouraging wireless communications services and the application of local land use regulations to the siting of telecommunications towers. It concludes that Congress’s effort to strike a balance in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 between local concerns on one hand and national commerce and homeland security on the other has proved vague in content and susceptible to procedural thickets that might make local parochialism impervious to challenge. The article suggests statutory changes, including time limitations and the creation of presumptions and safe harbor rules, that might better balance infrastructure development needs with local autonomy
The article discusses the regulation Telecommunications Act of 1996 in the U.S. It highlights that t...
In 1996, Congress passed the first substantial rework of the Communications Act of 1934. This Act wa...
For almost two decades, federal telecommunications regulators had preempted state telecommunications...
Given the increasing prominence of wireless communications within the broader realm of technological...
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates that personal wireless companies develop their ...
This note examines a Sixth Circuit ruling against the Federal Communication Commission which found t...
Part I of this Article outlines a few fundamentals upon which the subsequent analysis is based. It a...
For nearly a century, state regulators played an important role in telecommunications regulation. Th...
Since the grant of the first Commercial Mobile Radio Service ( CMRS ) license over twenty years ago,...
As the number of wireless telephone users continues to proliferate, so does the number of lawsuits a...
Recent innovations in mobile wireless technology have instigated a debate between two camps of legal...
This Article critically examines the division of regulatory jurisdiction over telecommunications iss...
As the United States becomes increasingly dependent on universal, high-speed wireless services, infr...
This article discusses changes in the U.S. telecommunications market over the last decade and argues...
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has yielded more litigation and less local competition than its s...
The article discusses the regulation Telecommunications Act of 1996 in the U.S. It highlights that t...
In 1996, Congress passed the first substantial rework of the Communications Act of 1934. This Act wa...
For almost two decades, federal telecommunications regulators had preempted state telecommunications...
Given the increasing prominence of wireless communications within the broader realm of technological...
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates that personal wireless companies develop their ...
This note examines a Sixth Circuit ruling against the Federal Communication Commission which found t...
Part I of this Article outlines a few fundamentals upon which the subsequent analysis is based. It a...
For nearly a century, state regulators played an important role in telecommunications regulation. Th...
Since the grant of the first Commercial Mobile Radio Service ( CMRS ) license over twenty years ago,...
As the number of wireless telephone users continues to proliferate, so does the number of lawsuits a...
Recent innovations in mobile wireless technology have instigated a debate between two camps of legal...
This Article critically examines the division of regulatory jurisdiction over telecommunications iss...
As the United States becomes increasingly dependent on universal, high-speed wireless services, infr...
This article discusses changes in the U.S. telecommunications market over the last decade and argues...
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has yielded more litigation and less local competition than its s...
The article discusses the regulation Telecommunications Act of 1996 in the U.S. It highlights that t...
In 1996, Congress passed the first substantial rework of the Communications Act of 1934. This Act wa...
For almost two decades, federal telecommunications regulators had preempted state telecommunications...