Nuclear Power and nuclear weapons plants seem to be an ultrahazardous activity for which strict liability should apply. However, unusual provisions of the Price-Anderson Act serve to shield nuclear power and nuclear weapons plants and associated activities from strict liability unless the federaq agency regulating the activity determins that a special from of strict liability can be applied
Thousands of people who lived downwind of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation have brought suit against ...
Article summarizes Carolina Environmental Study Group v United States Atomic Energy Commission and c...
The liability of operators of nuclear power stations for off-site damage done by accidents is capped...
This article critically examines the extraordinary nuclear occurrence threshold in light of its cong...
For more than a quarter century, public discourse has pushed the nuclear-power industry in the direc...
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 485 F. Supp. 566 (W.D. Okla. 1979) In the event of a major nuclear acc...
Ultra-hazardous risky activities as nuclear industry cannot be considered as “normal industries” i.e...
The Anderson Amendments were enacted to encourage private industry to enter the atomic energy field ...
Nuclear power will be the key to America\u27s energy future. While we still live in the wake of Sovi...
In 1946, the Congress of the United States enacted the original Atomic Energy Act as the framework f...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "An accident at...
Legal regimes regulating the exploitation of atomic energy follow three patterns. The pattern adopte...
International civil liability for nuclear damage is embodied by two major instruments: International...
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS--RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. INITIATIVE. Prohibits construction...
The Price-Anderson Act requires commercial nuclear power plants to maintain (approximately) $660 mil...
Thousands of people who lived downwind of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation have brought suit against ...
Article summarizes Carolina Environmental Study Group v United States Atomic Energy Commission and c...
The liability of operators of nuclear power stations for off-site damage done by accidents is capped...
This article critically examines the extraordinary nuclear occurrence threshold in light of its cong...
For more than a quarter century, public discourse has pushed the nuclear-power industry in the direc...
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 485 F. Supp. 566 (W.D. Okla. 1979) In the event of a major nuclear acc...
Ultra-hazardous risky activities as nuclear industry cannot be considered as “normal industries” i.e...
The Anderson Amendments were enacted to encourage private industry to enter the atomic energy field ...
Nuclear power will be the key to America\u27s energy future. While we still live in the wake of Sovi...
In 1946, the Congress of the United States enacted the original Atomic Energy Act as the framework f...
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "An accident at...
Legal regimes regulating the exploitation of atomic energy follow three patterns. The pattern adopte...
International civil liability for nuclear damage is embodied by two major instruments: International...
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS--RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. INITIATIVE. Prohibits construction...
The Price-Anderson Act requires commercial nuclear power plants to maintain (approximately) $660 mil...
Thousands of people who lived downwind of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation have brought suit against ...
Article summarizes Carolina Environmental Study Group v United States Atomic Energy Commission and c...
The liability of operators of nuclear power stations for off-site damage done by accidents is capped...