Add to ORKGLegal scholars talked about the potential impact of the presidential election on the Supreme Court. Among the topics they addressed were the current make up of the Supreme Court, how future justices might affect future decisions, and issues likely to come before the court. Following their remarks they answered questions from the audience
The upcoming presidential election of 2016 may very well become a pivotal moment in the evolution of...
We posit that Supreme Court oral arguments provide justices with useful information that in-fluences...
Wilson H. Elkins Professor Lyle Denniston and School of Law Dean Ronald Weich discuss President-Elec...
Legal scholars talked about the potential impact of the presidential election on the Supreme Court. ...
On Friday, September 11 at 5:30pm, the Supreme Court Preview will feature a panel on The Supreme Co...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
One of the most perplexing things about US elections is the extent to which we litigate what in much...
In view of the profound importance of questions of presidential succession and the lack of attention...
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held ...
The new President taking office in January 2017 will likely have the power to appoint at least one i...
The Symposium included in this issue of the Fordham Law Review provides scholars and lawyers with th...
This paper investigates how presidential candidates speak about the Supreme Court on the campaign tr...
My research was based on previous research conducted by Dr. Justin Wedeking, in the Department of Po...
Collected biweekly contributions to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news si...
On October 22, 2004, the Mercer Law Review and the Mercer Center for Legal Ethics and Professionalis...
The upcoming presidential election of 2016 may very well become a pivotal moment in the evolution of...
We posit that Supreme Court oral arguments provide justices with useful information that in-fluences...
Wilson H. Elkins Professor Lyle Denniston and School of Law Dean Ronald Weich discuss President-Elec...
Legal scholars talked about the potential impact of the presidential election on the Supreme Court. ...
On Friday, September 11 at 5:30pm, the Supreme Court Preview will feature a panel on The Supreme Co...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
One of the most perplexing things about US elections is the extent to which we litigate what in much...
In view of the profound importance of questions of presidential succession and the lack of attention...
Symposium: Congressional Power in the Shadow of the Rehnquist Court: Strategies for the Future held ...
The new President taking office in January 2017 will likely have the power to appoint at least one i...
The Symposium included in this issue of the Fordham Law Review provides scholars and lawyers with th...
This paper investigates how presidential candidates speak about the Supreme Court on the campaign tr...
My research was based on previous research conducted by Dr. Justin Wedeking, in the Department of Po...
Collected biweekly contributions to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news si...
On October 22, 2004, the Mercer Law Review and the Mercer Center for Legal Ethics and Professionalis...
The upcoming presidential election of 2016 may very well become a pivotal moment in the evolution of...
We posit that Supreme Court oral arguments provide justices with useful information that in-fluences...
Wilson H. Elkins Professor Lyle Denniston and School of Law Dean Ronald Weich discuss President-Elec...