The principal torts decisions this Survey year, especially in the products liability area, seemed to leave as many questions unanswered as they resolved. The Court of Appeals held that a noncontracting user\u27s claim for injuries from a defective product sounded in tort for limitations purposes, but the Court did not decide what limitation period would be applicable if a statutory breach of warranty claim were also asserted. The contributory negligence defense to a strict products liability claim was upheld by a reference to the appellate division\u27s opinion in a second-collision case. The analytically suspect sales - service distinction was reaffirmed in an enigmatic opinion by the Court.\u27 And the abnormally dangerous activity fo...