Add to ORKGThis Note explores the relevant law regarding the issue of indecency and obscenity in broadcast, with particular focus on a 2001 Policy Statement released by the FCC. The Author examines the major problems with the regulatory scheme as it now exists, and offers an alternative. The Author concludes by arguing that leaving the subjective decisions regarding indecency to market forces, leaving parents to determine what should or should not be indecent, and leaving the FCC free to pursue obscenity with greater zeal is the most appropriate course of action for the future
In the thirty-plus years since FCC v. Pacifica Foundation revolutionized content-based broadcast reg...
This cutting-edge book treats broadcast indecency as a social phenomenon challenging the policy appr...
This paper is adapted from a talk given by the author at Duke University School of Law on April 6, 2...
FCC regulations are among the most controversial administrative law regulations because of their imp...
Lawmakers and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have implemented policies, many at the urg...
Indecency regulations promulgated by the FCC used to be effective, but today\u27s technological adva...
Recent legislative actions by the federal government demonstrate a growing intolerance toward contro...
The Federal Communications Commission exercises the power to regulate the broadcast of constitutiona...
The article considers both the constitutional and statutory aspects of the regulation of indecency i...
Congress has empowered the Federal Communications Commission to regulate obscene, indecent, or pro...
Using an airing of the Victoria Secret fashion show as an example, the author explores the definitio...
Family values has become a familiar phrase in all arenas of American life. As a result of the incre...
The FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. case is the most recent iteration of an ongoing struggle to...
With the expansion of cable and free-air subscription television into more markets, interstate trans...
Two prominent television events in the past two years placed increased attention on the FCC and its...
In the thirty-plus years since FCC v. Pacifica Foundation revolutionized content-based broadcast reg...
This cutting-edge book treats broadcast indecency as a social phenomenon challenging the policy appr...
This paper is adapted from a talk given by the author at Duke University School of Law on April 6, 2...
FCC regulations are among the most controversial administrative law regulations because of their imp...
Lawmakers and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have implemented policies, many at the urg...
Indecency regulations promulgated by the FCC used to be effective, but today\u27s technological adva...
Recent legislative actions by the federal government demonstrate a growing intolerance toward contro...
The Federal Communications Commission exercises the power to regulate the broadcast of constitutiona...
The article considers both the constitutional and statutory aspects of the regulation of indecency i...
Congress has empowered the Federal Communications Commission to regulate obscene, indecent, or pro...
Using an airing of the Victoria Secret fashion show as an example, the author explores the definitio...
Family values has become a familiar phrase in all arenas of American life. As a result of the incre...
The FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. case is the most recent iteration of an ongoing struggle to...
With the expansion of cable and free-air subscription television into more markets, interstate trans...
Two prominent television events in the past two years placed increased attention on the FCC and its...
In the thirty-plus years since FCC v. Pacifica Foundation revolutionized content-based broadcast reg...
This cutting-edge book treats broadcast indecency as a social phenomenon challenging the policy appr...
This paper is adapted from a talk given by the author at Duke University School of Law on April 6, 2...