The decision whether to be a regulated common carrier or a non-regulated communications provider carries with it numerous benefits and burdens that must be weighed. Although one may automatically assume that non-regulation is preferable, that may not always be the case. This Article directly addresses the decision of whether to be a lightly-regulated non-dominant common carrier or a non-regulated private carrier. The Article argues that certain statutory and regulatory rights enjoyed by common carriers are more important than the minimal regulatory burdens associated with non-dominant common carrier regulation
The wireline telephone industry in the United States is the most complete and sophisticated system i...
“Net neutrality” refers to the principle that broadband providers should not discriminate when trans...
Telephone companies share with other public utilities a common law duty to provide their services on...
The decision whether to be a regulated common carrier or a non-regulated communications provider car...
The Communications Act of 1934 requires, among other things, that telephone companies as common car...
This article will examine court cases and actions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) tha...
The judicial decision invalidating the Federal Communications Commission\u27s first Open Internet Or...
This Article argues that some generalized interconnection rules are broadly appropriate. Specificall...
Concerns about the “concentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties” an...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
The judicial decision invalidating the Federal Communications Commission\u27s first Open Internet Or...
During the course of the network neutrality debate, advocates have proposed extending common carriag...
This article highlights the importance of civil legal regulation in the telecommunication industry. ...
The 2002 Common Regulatory Framework diversifies remedies to competition problems according to the m...
Abstract Purpose -This article considers internet system development with reference to what is curre...
The wireline telephone industry in the United States is the most complete and sophisticated system i...
“Net neutrality” refers to the principle that broadband providers should not discriminate when trans...
Telephone companies share with other public utilities a common law duty to provide their services on...
The decision whether to be a regulated common carrier or a non-regulated communications provider car...
The Communications Act of 1934 requires, among other things, that telephone companies as common car...
This article will examine court cases and actions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) tha...
The judicial decision invalidating the Federal Communications Commission\u27s first Open Internet Or...
This Article argues that some generalized interconnection rules are broadly appropriate. Specificall...
Concerns about the “concentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties” an...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
The judicial decision invalidating the Federal Communications Commission\u27s first Open Internet Or...
During the course of the network neutrality debate, advocates have proposed extending common carriag...
This article highlights the importance of civil legal regulation in the telecommunication industry. ...
The 2002 Common Regulatory Framework diversifies remedies to competition problems according to the m...
Abstract Purpose -This article considers internet system development with reference to what is curre...
The wireline telephone industry in the United States is the most complete and sophisticated system i...
“Net neutrality” refers to the principle that broadband providers should not discriminate when trans...
Telephone companies share with other public utilities a common law duty to provide their services on...