Add to ORKGThe purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its historic antecedents, the procedure by which sanctions may be sought and/or imposed, the sanctions which the court may impose and the persons upon whom the sanctions can be imposed
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
Professor Vairo discusses the compelling need to amend Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. She demo...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...
The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its hist...
This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sancti...
This article will argue that the standard for imposing sanctions under Rule 11 should focus on the n...
The House of Representatives has passed H.R. 720, a bill that would amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rul...
This 1981 Federal Judicial Center paper surveys the current state of the law with respect to sanctio...
With only a small risk of overstatement, one could say that sanctions in civil litigation exploded d...
The aim of this article is to analyze some of the complex issues involved in attempting to apply the...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires courts to sanction attorneys who file frivolous papers. ...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Since its amendment in 1983, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has become the focus of...
The 1983 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure arose from concern over the flood of litigation ...
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
Professor Vairo discusses the compelling need to amend Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. She demo...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...
The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its hist...
This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sancti...
This article will argue that the standard for imposing sanctions under Rule 11 should focus on the n...
The House of Representatives has passed H.R. 720, a bill that would amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rul...
This 1981 Federal Judicial Center paper surveys the current state of the law with respect to sanctio...
With only a small risk of overstatement, one could say that sanctions in civil litigation exploded d...
The aim of this article is to analyze some of the complex issues involved in attempting to apply the...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires courts to sanction attorneys who file frivolous papers. ...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Since its amendment in 1983, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has become the focus of...
The 1983 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure arose from concern over the flood of litigation ...
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
Professor Vairo discusses the compelling need to amend Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. She demo...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...