We lack consensus regarding who lawfully may be held in military custody in the contexts that matter most to U.S. national security today—- i.e., counterterrorism and counterinsurgency. More to the point, federal judges lack consensus on this question. They have grappled with it periodically since 2002, and for the past three years have dealt with it continually in connection with the flood of habeas corpus litigation arising out of Guantanamo in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. Bush. Unfortunately, the resulting detention jurisprudence is shot through with disagreement on points large and small, leaving the precise boundaries of the government’s detention authority unclear. The aim of this Article is to f...
This essay examines empirically the effect of the Supreme Court’s 2008 judgment in Boumediene v. Bus...
This article, published in a special post 9-11 issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, ...
Although the Constitution\u27s Suspension Clause explicitly mentions the writ of habeas corpus, it d...
We lack consensus regarding who lawfully may be held in military custody in the contexts that matter...
In Rasul v. Bush, the Supreme Court held that federal courts have jurisdiction over habeas corpus pe...
Especially after the recent Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. Bush, holding that constitutiona...
Following the harrowing events of September 11, 2001, and pursuant to the Authorization for Use of M...
The writ of habeas corpus activates courts’ duty to check arbitrary or unlawful restraints by the Ex...
The purpose of the article is to examine the meaning of habeas corpus in the age of the war on terro...
U.S. counterterrorism operations today are being carried out on an unprecedented scale. Since the at...
Commenting on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. Bush (2008) and the U.S. occupation o...
One of the most commonly asserted justifications for denying habeas review to individuals detained b...
To the extent that a state can detain terrorists pursuant to the law of war, how certain must the st...
In 2004-05, two American Citizens, Shaqir Omar and Mohamed Munaf were separately arrested in Iraq an...
U.S. detention policy is an extremely complex and controversial topic. The policy was developed thro...
This essay examines empirically the effect of the Supreme Court’s 2008 judgment in Boumediene v. Bus...
This article, published in a special post 9-11 issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, ...
Although the Constitution\u27s Suspension Clause explicitly mentions the writ of habeas corpus, it d...
We lack consensus regarding who lawfully may be held in military custody in the contexts that matter...
In Rasul v. Bush, the Supreme Court held that federal courts have jurisdiction over habeas corpus pe...
Especially after the recent Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. Bush, holding that constitutiona...
Following the harrowing events of September 11, 2001, and pursuant to the Authorization for Use of M...
The writ of habeas corpus activates courts’ duty to check arbitrary or unlawful restraints by the Ex...
The purpose of the article is to examine the meaning of habeas corpus in the age of the war on terro...
U.S. counterterrorism operations today are being carried out on an unprecedented scale. Since the at...
Commenting on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. Bush (2008) and the U.S. occupation o...
One of the most commonly asserted justifications for denying habeas review to individuals detained b...
To the extent that a state can detain terrorists pursuant to the law of war, how certain must the st...
In 2004-05, two American Citizens, Shaqir Omar and Mohamed Munaf were separately arrested in Iraq an...
U.S. detention policy is an extremely complex and controversial topic. The policy was developed thro...
This essay examines empirically the effect of the Supreme Court’s 2008 judgment in Boumediene v. Bus...
This article, published in a special post 9-11 issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, ...
Although the Constitution\u27s Suspension Clause explicitly mentions the writ of habeas corpus, it d...