Add to ORKGRecent case law has dictated changes in the treatment of tort cases involving mentally impaired citizens. This study illuminates the developing exceptions to liability with regard to properly trained professional caregivers
Sometimes a new solution is the best way to fix an old problem. Currently, relying on a case from th...
This article considers possible liability issues associated with mental health professionals in ligh...
The notion that mens rea is an indicia of culpability runs deep in the American criminal law psyche....
At common law, liability in negligence is based generally on an objective standard ofreasonable care...
The standard of care to be applied in tort cases involving mentally disabled people has not been rec...
In Australia, the reduced mental capacity which is characteristic of children alters the standard of...
Mental illness is almost never considered when courts determine whether a defendant is liable for a ...
This Note argues that the distinction between what constitutes a physical versus a mental disability...
Un número considerable de personas mayores padece alguna enfermedad neurodegenerativa que limita sus...
An essential element of the tort of negligence is the duty of care, which is measured by the objecti...
A defendant's ‘insanity’ will not excuse his or her negligence. According to corrective justice theo...
Assessment of liability in negligence cases is based on the objective standard of reasonable care. A...
A Review of Mental Disabilities and Criminal Responsibility by Herbert Fingarette and Ann Fingarette...
Defendants can deny they have agency, and thus responsibility, for a crime by using a defense of men...
Defendants can deny they have agency, and thus responsibility, for a crime by using a defense of men...
Sometimes a new solution is the best way to fix an old problem. Currently, relying on a case from th...
This article considers possible liability issues associated with mental health professionals in ligh...
The notion that mens rea is an indicia of culpability runs deep in the American criminal law psyche....
At common law, liability in negligence is based generally on an objective standard ofreasonable care...
The standard of care to be applied in tort cases involving mentally disabled people has not been rec...
In Australia, the reduced mental capacity which is characteristic of children alters the standard of...
Mental illness is almost never considered when courts determine whether a defendant is liable for a ...
This Note argues that the distinction between what constitutes a physical versus a mental disability...
Un número considerable de personas mayores padece alguna enfermedad neurodegenerativa que limita sus...
An essential element of the tort of negligence is the duty of care, which is measured by the objecti...
A defendant's ‘insanity’ will not excuse his or her negligence. According to corrective justice theo...
Assessment of liability in negligence cases is based on the objective standard of reasonable care. A...
A Review of Mental Disabilities and Criminal Responsibility by Herbert Fingarette and Ann Fingarette...
Defendants can deny they have agency, and thus responsibility, for a crime by using a defense of men...
Defendants can deny they have agency, and thus responsibility, for a crime by using a defense of men...
Sometimes a new solution is the best way to fix an old problem. Currently, relying on a case from th...
This article considers possible liability issues associated with mental health professionals in ligh...
The notion that mens rea is an indicia of culpability runs deep in the American criminal law psyche....