In the eighty years since Alexander Sack coined the phrase odious debt, academics and activists have periodically rediscovered Sack\u27s idea, often arguing for its application or extension-to this point, in vain. Here, Tarullo reveals the degree to which current interest in the problem of odious debt is intertwined with other problems that strike more critically at the well-being of developing-and emerging-market countries. He reasons that the necessarily complex effort needed to institutionalize a doctrine of odious debt is a potentially effective organizing principle for generating the political will to address these other persistent, debilitating problems
Creditors loosely lend funds to third world nations controlled by despotic governments who in turn...
This essay suggests that odious debt needs a restatement to stay relevant in the face of important c...
Some sovereign debt, such as that of apartheid South Africa, is incurred without the consent of the ...
Odious regimes have always been there. That there is no silver-bullet solution that will prevent odi...
Current odious debt doctrine– using the term “doctrine” loosely, since it has never formally been ad...
This Article looks at the generally agreed upon characteristics of the odious debt doctrine and co...
In a sense, all debts are odious; that is, to use dictionary definitions, hateful; disgusting; offe...
Odious debts are debts incurred by the government of a nation without either popular consent or a le...
The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 revived public and academic debate about a wobbly old doctrine of in...
Despite the popularity of the term among advocates of debt forgiveness, there is little agreement on...
Backer examines how the traditional notion of odious debt as a method of repudiating sovereign debt ...
The doctrine of odious debts came into its full in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century to de...
Sovereigns incur debts, and creditors look to the law to hold sovereigns to their obligations. In le...
Odious debt is more of a literature than a doctrine. Going back to at least the 1920s, one can find ...
Odious debts have been the subject of debate in academic, activist, and policymaking circles in rec...
Creditors loosely lend funds to third world nations controlled by despotic governments who in turn...
This essay suggests that odious debt needs a restatement to stay relevant in the face of important c...
Some sovereign debt, such as that of apartheid South Africa, is incurred without the consent of the ...
Odious regimes have always been there. That there is no silver-bullet solution that will prevent odi...
Current odious debt doctrine– using the term “doctrine” loosely, since it has never formally been ad...
This Article looks at the generally agreed upon characteristics of the odious debt doctrine and co...
In a sense, all debts are odious; that is, to use dictionary definitions, hateful; disgusting; offe...
Odious debts are debts incurred by the government of a nation without either popular consent or a le...
The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 revived public and academic debate about a wobbly old doctrine of in...
Despite the popularity of the term among advocates of debt forgiveness, there is little agreement on...
Backer examines how the traditional notion of odious debt as a method of repudiating sovereign debt ...
The doctrine of odious debts came into its full in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century to de...
Sovereigns incur debts, and creditors look to the law to hold sovereigns to their obligations. In le...
Odious debt is more of a literature than a doctrine. Going back to at least the 1920s, one can find ...
Odious debts have been the subject of debate in academic, activist, and policymaking circles in rec...
Creditors loosely lend funds to third world nations controlled by despotic governments who in turn...
This essay suggests that odious debt needs a restatement to stay relevant in the face of important c...
Some sovereign debt, such as that of apartheid South Africa, is incurred without the consent of the ...