In this Introduction, I will briefly summarize Des Rosiers\u27 Court Review article, entitled From Telling to Listening: A Therapeutic Analysis of the Role of Courts in Minority-Majority Conflicts, placing it in a framework that transcends minority-majority conflicts and encourages discussion regarding the use of therapeutic jurisprudence by appellate tribunals. My brief summary is followed by a series of comments that have the potential of launching a refreshing line of inquiry into the appellate process, opinion writing, and the formulation of legal doctrine
Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Foundations, Expansion, and Assessment Founded in 1987 by law professors ...
Understanding the different standards of review is necessary to the lawyer\u27s informed reading of ...
Problem-solving courts appear to achieve outcomes that are not common in mainstream courts. There ar...
In this Introduction, I will briefly summarize Des Rosiers\u27 Court Review article, entitled From T...
This Article begins with a modest objective and ends with an ambitious one. First, it asserts that a...
Having recognized that there can be both therapeutic and antitherapeutic effects of judicial decisio...
If therapeutic jurisprudence is so good, its applicability should not be limited to the trial courts...
To date, the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles has been concentrated mainly on spe...
Therapeutic jurisprudence has multiple possibilities, provided it does not add another layer of cost...
This Article explores ways in which appellate decision-making can be enhanced so as to minimize the ...
This article offers a number of suggestions concerning how judges should act in problem solving cour...
An appellate court is often characterized by the opinions that it writes. Though an appellate opinio...
Therapeutic jurisprudence, developed in the late 1980s, is a field of inquiry. It is a lens through ...
The article discusses the constitutionality and propriety of appellate courts of the U.S. that are t...
‘Improving therapeutic outcomes for defendants: measuring the therapeutic contributions of legal act...
Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Foundations, Expansion, and Assessment Founded in 1987 by law professors ...
Understanding the different standards of review is necessary to the lawyer\u27s informed reading of ...
Problem-solving courts appear to achieve outcomes that are not common in mainstream courts. There ar...
In this Introduction, I will briefly summarize Des Rosiers\u27 Court Review article, entitled From T...
This Article begins with a modest objective and ends with an ambitious one. First, it asserts that a...
Having recognized that there can be both therapeutic and antitherapeutic effects of judicial decisio...
If therapeutic jurisprudence is so good, its applicability should not be limited to the trial courts...
To date, the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles has been concentrated mainly on spe...
Therapeutic jurisprudence has multiple possibilities, provided it does not add another layer of cost...
This Article explores ways in which appellate decision-making can be enhanced so as to minimize the ...
This article offers a number of suggestions concerning how judges should act in problem solving cour...
An appellate court is often characterized by the opinions that it writes. Though an appellate opinio...
Therapeutic jurisprudence, developed in the late 1980s, is a field of inquiry. It is a lens through ...
The article discusses the constitutionality and propriety of appellate courts of the U.S. that are t...
‘Improving therapeutic outcomes for defendants: measuring the therapeutic contributions of legal act...
Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Foundations, Expansion, and Assessment Founded in 1987 by law professors ...
Understanding the different standards of review is necessary to the lawyer\u27s informed reading of ...
Problem-solving courts appear to achieve outcomes that are not common in mainstream courts. There ar...