This paper presents an empirical analysis of criminal antitrust prosecutions undertaken by the Department of Justice during the period 1955-1993. The authors report data on the number of criminal cases, the type of offense alleged, whether the defendants were individuals or firms, the position individual defendants held in their firm, the Department of Justice\u27s won/lost record and the nature and amount of any sanctions imposed. A brief discussion of whether the reported sanctions have been adequate to promote efficient deterrence is also presented
This article will evaluate the intent issue in several steps. First, Gypsum and its progeny will be ...
When an attorney discovers clear evidence that his corporate client has committed an antitrust felon...
This is an empirical study of Department of Justice (DOJ) enforcement of the antitrust laws. Its pur...
This paper presents an empirical analysis of criminal antitrust prosecutions undertaken by the Depar...
The Biden Justice Department has announced that it may begin to bring criminal monopolization cases ...
The Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust penalties have become harsher for violating individuals an...
Although the Sherman Act was enacted over a century ago, antitrust enforcers, policy makers, and sch...
This Paper presents information about forty of the largest recent successful private antitrust cases...
Journal ArticlePerhaps the most violently debated issue in the law of antitrust remedies is whether ...
Gallo et al. (1994) analyze the sanctions imposed on firms convicted of criminal price-fixing under ...
This article shows that private enforcement of the U. S. antitrust laws-which usually is derided as ...
The goal of this Report is to take a first step toward providing an empirical basis for assessing wh...
This Article evaluates two different economic models of criminal law as applied to the enforcement o...
The U.S. Department of Justice has prosecuted over 1600 criminal antitrust (price-fixing and related...
The proper role of neoclassical economic theory in the resolution of antitrust disputes will continu...
This article will evaluate the intent issue in several steps. First, Gypsum and its progeny will be ...
When an attorney discovers clear evidence that his corporate client has committed an antitrust felon...
This is an empirical study of Department of Justice (DOJ) enforcement of the antitrust laws. Its pur...
This paper presents an empirical analysis of criminal antitrust prosecutions undertaken by the Depar...
The Biden Justice Department has announced that it may begin to bring criminal monopolization cases ...
The Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust penalties have become harsher for violating individuals an...
Although the Sherman Act was enacted over a century ago, antitrust enforcers, policy makers, and sch...
This Paper presents information about forty of the largest recent successful private antitrust cases...
Journal ArticlePerhaps the most violently debated issue in the law of antitrust remedies is whether ...
Gallo et al. (1994) analyze the sanctions imposed on firms convicted of criminal price-fixing under ...
This article shows that private enforcement of the U. S. antitrust laws-which usually is derided as ...
The goal of this Report is to take a first step toward providing an empirical basis for assessing wh...
This Article evaluates two different economic models of criminal law as applied to the enforcement o...
The U.S. Department of Justice has prosecuted over 1600 criminal antitrust (price-fixing and related...
The proper role of neoclassical economic theory in the resolution of antitrust disputes will continu...
This article will evaluate the intent issue in several steps. First, Gypsum and its progeny will be ...
When an attorney discovers clear evidence that his corporate client has committed an antitrust felon...
This is an empirical study of Department of Justice (DOJ) enforcement of the antitrust laws. Its pur...