This Article, the first broad-based analysis of punitive damages in judge-tried cases, compares judge and jury performance in awarding punitive damages and in setting their levels. Data covering one year of judge and jury trial outcomes from forty-five of the nation\u27s largest counties yield no substantial evidence that judges and juries differ in the rate at which they award punitive damages or in the central relation between the size of punitive awards and compensatory awards. The relation between punitive and compensatory awards in jury trials is strikingly similar to the relation in judge trials. For a given level of compensatory award, there is a greater range of punitive awards in jury trials than in judge trials. The greater spread...
Punitive damages have prompted much academic and political debate during the last twenty years. In t...
In response to concerns that jury awards in tort cases are excessive and unpredictable, nearly every...
This article assesses the relation between compensatory damages and punitive damages in cases leadin...
This Article, the first broad-based analysis of punitive damages in judge-tried cases, compares judg...
article published in law journalThis paper presents the first empirical anatysis that demonstrates t...
We analyze thousands of trials from a substantial fraction of the nation\u27s most populous counties...
We analyze thousands of trials from a substantial fraction of the nation’s most populous counties as...
Empirical studies have consistently shown that punitive damages are rarely awarded, with rates of ab...
Fueled by anecdotal instances of extremely large damage awards, there has been significant public co...
The state of punitive damages in the United States has been a controversial topic for more than thre...
Using one year of jury trial outcomes from 45 of the nation\u27s most populous counties, this articl...
Using data from punitive damages decisions of U.S. federal circuit courts from 2004 to 2012, this pa...
This article assesses the relation between punitive and compensatory damages by combining two data s...
Punitive damages have prompted much academic and political debate during the last twenty years. In t...
In response to concerns that jury awards in tort cases are excessive and unpredictable, nearly every...
This article assesses the relation between compensatory damages and punitive damages in cases leadin...
This Article, the first broad-based analysis of punitive damages in judge-tried cases, compares judg...
article published in law journalThis paper presents the first empirical anatysis that demonstrates t...
We analyze thousands of trials from a substantial fraction of the nation\u27s most populous counties...
We analyze thousands of trials from a substantial fraction of the nation’s most populous counties as...
Empirical studies have consistently shown that punitive damages are rarely awarded, with rates of ab...
Fueled by anecdotal instances of extremely large damage awards, there has been significant public co...
The state of punitive damages in the United States has been a controversial topic for more than thre...
Using one year of jury trial outcomes from 45 of the nation\u27s most populous counties, this articl...
Using data from punitive damages decisions of U.S. federal circuit courts from 2004 to 2012, this pa...
This article assesses the relation between punitive and compensatory damages by combining two data s...
Punitive damages have prompted much academic and political debate during the last twenty years. In t...
In response to concerns that jury awards in tort cases are excessive and unpredictable, nearly every...
This article assesses the relation between compensatory damages and punitive damages in cases leadin...