Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in content and in application because legal systems are biased in favor of unravelling those rules and principles. In this article I attempt to show what these biases are, and why commentators who have argued that the law tends toward certainty are wrong, then describe various attempts which have been made at restoring certainty, and why these attempts have generally not worked. My conclusion is that these proposals are at best holding actions, and that the tendency toward increasing uncertainty in the law is inexorable
Legal principles enable society to order itself by preserving broadly based expectations. Sometimes,...
For this issue of the Review, the editors invited me to reflection. In response, I wish to consider...
Uncertain legal standards are pervasive but understudied. The key theoretical result showing an ambi...
Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in ...
The question addressed by this article is whether it is possible to state that European adherence to...
This article reviews key aspects of the theoretical debate on the distinction between bright-line r...
This article examines the impact of four types of law-related uncertainty on the utility of risk-neu...
There is extensive literature on whether courts or legislators produce efficient rules, but which of...
This article challenges the conventional view and proclaims the advantages of legal uncertainty. Thi...
There is extensive literature on whether courts or legislators produce efficient rules, but which of...
This article explains incoherencies in the Court’s judgments regarding the principle of legal certai...
textabstractWhen law-and-economics scholars discuss legal uncertainty, they problematise the use of ...
Consider legal uncertainty as uncertainty about the legality of a specificaction. In particular, sup...
Traditional choice of law theory conceives of certainty and flexibility as opposed values: increase ...
Legal theorists, judges, and legal writing instructors persistently decry the assertions of certaint...
Legal principles enable society to order itself by preserving broadly based expectations. Sometimes,...
For this issue of the Review, the editors invited me to reflection. In response, I wish to consider...
Uncertain legal standards are pervasive but understudied. The key theoretical result showing an ambi...
Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in ...
The question addressed by this article is whether it is possible to state that European adherence to...
This article reviews key aspects of the theoretical debate on the distinction between bright-line r...
This article examines the impact of four types of law-related uncertainty on the utility of risk-neu...
There is extensive literature on whether courts or legislators produce efficient rules, but which of...
This article challenges the conventional view and proclaims the advantages of legal uncertainty. Thi...
There is extensive literature on whether courts or legislators produce efficient rules, but which of...
This article explains incoherencies in the Court’s judgments regarding the principle of legal certai...
textabstractWhen law-and-economics scholars discuss legal uncertainty, they problematise the use of ...
Consider legal uncertainty as uncertainty about the legality of a specificaction. In particular, sup...
Traditional choice of law theory conceives of certainty and flexibility as opposed values: increase ...
Legal theorists, judges, and legal writing instructors persistently decry the assertions of certaint...
Legal principles enable society to order itself by preserving broadly based expectations. Sometimes,...
For this issue of the Review, the editors invited me to reflection. In response, I wish to consider...
Uncertain legal standards are pervasive but understudied. The key theoretical result showing an ambi...