On September 21, 1990, the First Circuit handed down its decision in Town of Concord, Massachusetts v. Boston Edison Co. This case, the most recent in a growing line of court of appeals decisions examining the antitrust implications of public utility rate structures, represents the first time a United States court of appeals has unequivocally stated that an antitrust action based upon a “price squeeze” could not be maintained against a utility whose wholesale and retail rates were both fully regulated. Town of Concord notwithstanding, the courts are far from agreeing whether investor-owned electric or natural gas utilities are immune from federal antitrust liability arising from rates approved by the appropriate state or federal regulators,...
Dynegy is one of the country\u27s leading energy merchants - formerly NGC Corporation and Natural Ga...
The requirement that an antitrust plaintiff show market power in rule of reason cases has an uninspi...
In a 6-2 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the United States Supreme Court upheld FERC Order No. 7...
On September 21, 1990, the First Circuit handed down its decision in Town of Concord, Massachusetts ...
In its Keogh decision the Supreme Court held that although the Interstate Commerce Act did not exemp...
The state action antitrust exemption, also known as the state action immunity doctrine, is used by a...
In Cantor v. Detroit Edison, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a power utility regulated by the State...
Many industries are subject toregulation, whether by the federal government,the state, or both. Elec...
This is a review of Supreme Court decisions for the past eight years on the subject of the applicati...
The Supreme Court has created various tests in cases involving antitrust preemption of state regulat...
article published in law reviewRegulatory agencies are increasingly adopting ex ante rules to set ma...
State and federal initiatives have opened the American electric power industry to competition over t...
A price squeeze occurs when a vertically integrated firm squeezes\u27 a rival\u27s margins between ...
Public utility markets in the United States are commonly subject to both price and entry regulation....
The appellee was engaged in the business of selling natural gas. A rival utility entered the field d...
Dynegy is one of the country\u27s leading energy merchants - formerly NGC Corporation and Natural Ga...
The requirement that an antitrust plaintiff show market power in rule of reason cases has an uninspi...
In a 6-2 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the United States Supreme Court upheld FERC Order No. 7...
On September 21, 1990, the First Circuit handed down its decision in Town of Concord, Massachusetts ...
In its Keogh decision the Supreme Court held that although the Interstate Commerce Act did not exemp...
The state action antitrust exemption, also known as the state action immunity doctrine, is used by a...
In Cantor v. Detroit Edison, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a power utility regulated by the State...
Many industries are subject toregulation, whether by the federal government,the state, or both. Elec...
This is a review of Supreme Court decisions for the past eight years on the subject of the applicati...
The Supreme Court has created various tests in cases involving antitrust preemption of state regulat...
article published in law reviewRegulatory agencies are increasingly adopting ex ante rules to set ma...
State and federal initiatives have opened the American electric power industry to competition over t...
A price squeeze occurs when a vertically integrated firm squeezes\u27 a rival\u27s margins between ...
Public utility markets in the United States are commonly subject to both price and entry regulation....
The appellee was engaged in the business of selling natural gas. A rival utility entered the field d...
Dynegy is one of the country\u27s leading energy merchants - formerly NGC Corporation and Natural Ga...
The requirement that an antitrust plaintiff show market power in rule of reason cases has an uninspi...
In a 6-2 opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the United States Supreme Court upheld FERC Order No. 7...